Spillover effects of the US economic policy uncertainty in Latin America

被引:0
作者
Coronado, Semei [1 ]
Martinez, Jose N. [2 ]
Venegas-Martinez, Francisco [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guadalajara, Dept Metodos Cuantitat, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
[2] Calif State Univ Dominguez Hills, Dept Accounting Finance & Econ, Coll Business Adm & Publ Policy, Carson, CA 90747 USA
[3] Inst Politecn Nacl, Escuela Super Econ, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
来源
ESTUDIOS DE ECONOMIA | 2020年 / 47卷 / 02期
关键词
Economic policy uncertainty; structural vector autoregressive; impulse response function; robust Granger-causality tests;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper is aimed at assessing the spillover effects of the US Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) in macroeconomic variables of major Latin American Countries (LAC): Mexico, Colombia, Brazil, and Chile. To do that, we estimate a set of two-country Structural Vector Autoregressive (SVAR) models for 1997-2019; each model includes the US and one of the LAC. We use the following variables: EPU indexes, exchange rates, consumer price indexes, industrial production (IP), and interest rates (IR) of the US and the studied LAC. The main finding is that positive shocks in the US EPU index lead to currency depreciation for all four LAC; the largest effect is for Mexico. Other statistically significant results are a brief and small positive impact on Colombia's IP and a positive impact on Mexico's IR. The remaining LAC's estimates are statistically insignificant. For this reason, we applied Rossi and Wang's (2019) robust Granger causality tests that considers structural breaks. Finally, the estimates before and after the 2008 financial crisis suggest that LAC became slightly more responsive to US EPU shocks after the crisis.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 293
页数:21
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Impact of US policy uncertainty on Mexico: Evidence from linear and nonlinear tests [J].
Alam, Md Rafayet ;
Istiak, Khandokar .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 77 :355-366
[2]   Drifts and volatilities: monetary policies and outcomes in the post WWIIUS [J].
Cogley, T ;
Sargent, TJ .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2005, 8 (02) :262-302
[3]   Economic policy uncertainty in the US: Does it matter for the Euro area? [J].
Colombo, Valentina .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2013, 121 (01) :39-42
[4]  
Dieppe A., 2018, Bayesian Estimation, Analysis and Regression (BEAR) Toolbox: Technical Guide
[5]  
Granger C. W., 2001, ESSAYS ECONOMETRICS, V32, P457
[6]  
Im K.S., 2014, FESTSCHRIFT HONOR PE, P315
[7]   Measuring Uncertainty [J].
Jurado, Kyle ;
Ludvigson, Sydney C. ;
Ng, Serena .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 105 (03) :1177-1216
[8]   The Changing Transmission of Uncertainty Shocks in the US [J].
Mumtaz, Haroon ;
Theodoridis, Konstantinos .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2018, 36 (02) :239-252
[9]   Optimal tests for nested model selection with underlying parameter instability [J].
Rossi, B .
ECONOMETRIC THEORY, 2005, 21 (05) :962-990
[10]   Vector autoregressive-based Granger causality test in the presence of instabilities [J].
Rossi, Barbara ;
Wang, Yiru .
STATA JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (04) :883-899