Bioelectric Fields of Marine Organisms: Voltage and Frequency Contributions to Detectability by Electroreceptive Predators

被引:34
作者
Bedore, Christine N. [1 ]
Kajiura, Stephen M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida Atlantic Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
来源
PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ZOOLOGY | 2013年 / 86卷 / 03期
关键词
JUVENILE SCALLOPED HAMMERHEAD; WEAK ELECTRIC-FIELDS; SPHYRNA-LEWINI; FEEDING-HABITS; FOOD-HABITS; SHARKS; ELASMOBRANCH; FISH; STINGRAY; PREY;
D O I
10.1086/669973
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Behavioral responses of elasmobranch fishes to weak electric fields have been well studied. These studies typically employ a stimulator that produces a dipole electric field intended to simulate the natural electric field of prey items. However, the characteristics of bioelectric fields have not been well described. The magnitude and frequency of the electric field produced by 11 families of marine organisms were quantified in this study. Invertebrate electric potentials ranged from 14 to 28 mu V and did not differ from those of elasmobranchs, which ranged from 18 to 30 mu V. Invertebrates and elasmobranchs produced electric potentials smaller than those of teleost fishes, which ranged from 39 to 319 mu V. All species produced electric fields within the frequency range that is detectable by elasmobranch predators (<16 Hz), with the highest frequencies produced by the penaeids (10.3 Hz) and the gerreids (4.6 Hz). Although voltage differed by family, there was no relationship between voltage and mass or length of prey. Differences in prey voltage may be related to osmoregulatory strategies; invertebrates and elasmobranchs are osmoconformers and have less ion exchange with the surrounding seawater than teleosts species, which are hyposmotic. As predicted, voltage production was greatest at the mucous membrane-lined mouth and gills, which are sites of direct ion exchange with the environment.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 311
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Jaws: The inside story. The metabolism of elasmobranch fishes [J].
Ballantyne, JS .
COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY B-BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1997, 118 (04) :703-742
[2]  
Bauer RT, 1999, J MORPHOL, V242, P125, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4687(199911)242:2<125::AID-JMOR5>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-O
[4]   THE PHYLOGENETIC DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRORECEPTION - EVIDENCE FOR CONVERGENT EVOLUTION OF A PRIMITIVE VERTEBRATE SENSE MODALITY [J].
BULLOCK, TH ;
BODZNICK, DA ;
NORTHCUTT, RG .
BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS, 1983, 6 (01) :25-46
[5]   Diet and diel feeding periodicity of juvenile scalloped hammerhead sharks, Sphyrna lewini, in Kane'ohe Bay, O'ahu, Hawai'i [J].
Bush, A .
ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES, 2003, 67 (01) :1-11
[6]  
CLARKE TA, 1971, PAC SCI, V25, P133
[7]  
Cook D.A., 1994, Master's Thesis
[8]  
Cortes E, 1996, B MAR SCI, V58, P353
[9]   Electroreception in the Guiana dolphin (Sotalia guianensis) [J].
Czech-Damal, Nicole U. ;
Liebschner, Alexander ;
Miersch, Lars ;
Klauer, Gertrud ;
Hanke, Frederike D. ;
Marshall, Christopher ;
Dehnhardt, Guido ;
Hanke, Wolf .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 279 (1729) :663-668
[10]   Behavioural relevance of AC and DC in prey detection by the brown bullhead, Ameiurus nebulosus [J].
Eeuwes, Lonneke B. M. ;
Peters, Robert C. ;
Bretschneider, Franklin .
ANIMAL BIOLOGY, 2008, 58 (03) :321-336