Probing Organization Performance Using a New Hybrid Dynamic MCDM Method Based on the Balanced Scorecard Approach

被引:19
作者
Chen, Fu-Hsiang [1 ]
Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Culture Univ, Dept Accounting, Taipei 11114, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taipei Univ, Coll Publ Affairs, Grad Inst Urban Planning, New Taipei City 23741, Taiwan
关键词
balanced scorecard; organization performance; DEMATEL-based ANP; MCDM; VIKOR; EVALUATION MODEL; IMPROVEMENT; FRAMEWORK; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1520/JTE20130181
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
In recent years, the balanced scorecard (BSC) approach has become an important performance evaluation tool. However, in order to find ways to ensure that the model more accurately reflects the interdependence and feedback problems related to each factor that occurs in real world situations, a hybrid dynamic Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) BSC model is developed. The goal is to establish an evaluation and relationship model of organization performance that is based on the BSC approach. In this approach, the DEMATEL technique is used to explore how various factors influence each other while the basic concept of analytic network process (ANP) with DEMATEL (known as DANP, DEMATEL-based ANP) is used to yield the influential weights for the dimensions/criteria. Finally, the VIKOR method is used to evaluate gaps in the performance matrix. Empirical analysis helps to determine performance gaps and improve the scores for achieving the aspiration levels for each factor which have been determined based on influential network relationship mapping using the DEMATEL technique. The results show that this method can be used to extract the major factors that can enhance an organization's management performance, leading to continuous improvement. The method can be used to help an organization to evaluate and revise its strategies, and generally to adopt modern management approaches in every day practice.
引用
收藏
页码:924 / 937
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Does the balanced scorecard support organizational viability? [J].
Achterbergh, J ;
Beeres, R ;
Vriens, D .
KYBERNETES, 2003, 32 (9-10) :1387-1404
[2]   The balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of performance measures linked to strategy [J].
Banker, RD ;
Chang, HS ;
Pizzini, MJ .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2004, 79 (01) :1-23
[3]   A balanced scorecard analysis of performance metrics [J].
Banker, RD ;
Chang, HH ;
Janakiraman, SN ;
Konstans, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 154 (02) :423-436
[4]   Generic knowledge strategies in the US pharmaceutical industry [J].
Bierly, P ;
Chakrabarti, A .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 17 :123-135
[5]  
Booth R., 1996, ManagementAccounting, V74, P48
[6]   A framework for dynamic multiple-criteria decision making [J].
Campanella, Gianluca ;
Ribeiro, Rita A. .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2011, 52 (01) :52-60
[7]   Financial versus non-financial information: The impact of information organization and presentation in a Balanced Scorecard [J].
Cardinaels, Eddy ;
van Veen-Dirks, Paula M. G. .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2010, 35 (06) :565-578
[8]   A New Method for Threat Assessment and Uncertainty Analysis of Air-Raid-Target-Based on Connection Number [J].
Chen, Yong-Guang ;
Ke, Hong-Fa ;
He, Ke .
JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION, 2012, 40 (06) :1033-1040
[9]  
Davis S., 2004, Management Accounting Research, V15, P135, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.MAR.2003.11.001, 10.1016/j.mar.2003.11.001]
[10]  
Denton G.A., 2000, CORNELL HOTEL REST A, V41, P94, DOI DOI 10.1177/001088040004100127