PRETREATMENT FDG-PET STANDARDIZED UPTAKE VALUE AS A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR FOR OUTCOME IN HEAD AND NECK CANCER

被引:87
作者
Machtay, Mitchell [1 ,2 ]
Natwa, Mona [2 ,3 ]
Andrei, Jocelyn [2 ,4 ]
Hyslop, Terry [2 ,4 ]
Anne, P. Rani [1 ,2 ]
Lavarino, Jororsali [1 ,2 ]
Intenzo, Charles M. [2 ,3 ]
Keane, William [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Jefferson Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Kimmel Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Radiol Nucl Med, Jefferson Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[4] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Biostat, Jefferson Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[5] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Jefferson Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
来源
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK | 2009年 / 31卷 / 02期
关键词
PET scan; PET SUV; head and neck cancer; radiotherapy; prognostic factors; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; LUNG-CANCER; PREDICTION; RADIOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL; ONCOLOGY; SUV;
D O I
10.1002/hed.20942
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background. We studied the potential prognostic significance of pretreatment 18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) standardized uptake value (SUV) in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Methods. A retrospective review of the pretreatment FDG-PET scans of 60 patients with SCCHN was performed. All patients received radiotherapy and 37 also received concurrent chemotherapy. SUV was calculated by 2 nuclear-medicine physicians who were blinded to the clinical data. Disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed with respect to SUV (and other potential prognostic factors). Results. The median SUV was 7.2 (range, 1-24.7); 34 patients (57%) had SUV < 9.0 compared with 26 patients (43%) with an SUV >= 9.0. The group with low SUV had significantly better 2-year DFS compared with the high SUV group (72% vs 37%), p = .007. On multivariate analysis, stage and age were also associated with DFS, but SUV remained an independent predictor of DFS (hazard ratio: 1.08; p = .016). Conclusion. SUV was significantly associated with outcome after modern definitive therapy of SCCHN. (C) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 31: 195-201, 2009
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 201
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Prediction of outcome in head-and-neck cancer patients using the standardized uptake value of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose [J].
Allal, AS ;
Slosman, DO ;
Kebdani, T ;
Allaoua, M ;
Lehmann, W ;
Dulguerov, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (05) :1295-1300
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]   Molecular biomarkers and site of first recurrence after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer [J].
Ataman, ÖU ;
Bentzen, SM ;
Wilson, GD ;
Daley, FM ;
Richman, PI ;
Saunders, MI ;
Dische, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 40 (18) :2734-2741
[4]  
Beaulieu S, 2003, J NUCL MED, V44, P1044
[5]   Individual patients' data meta-analyses in head and neck cancer [J].
Bourhis, Jean ;
Le Maitre, Aurelie ;
Baujat, Bertrand ;
Audry, Helene ;
Pignon, Jean-Pierre .
CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2007, 19 (03) :188-194
[6]   FDG pet studies during treatment:: Prediction of therapy outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [J].
Brun, E ;
Kjellén, E ;
Tennvall, J ;
Ohlsson, T ;
Sandell, A ;
Perfekt, R ;
Wennerberg, J ;
Strand, SE .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2002, 24 (02) :127-135
[7]  
Erdi YE, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, P1287
[8]   FDG-PET. A possible prognostic factor in head and neck cancer [J].
Halfpenny, W ;
Hain, SF ;
Biassoni, L ;
Maisey, MN ;
Sherman, JA ;
McGurk, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 86 (04) :512-516
[9]  
KEYES JW, 1995, J NUCL MED, V36, P1836
[10]   FDG-PET for prediction of tumour aggressiveness and response to intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy in head and neck cancer [J].
Kitagawa, Y ;
Sano, K ;
Nishizawa, S ;
Nakamura, M ;
Ogasawara, T ;
Sadato, N ;
Yonekura, Y .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2003, 30 (01) :63-71