Bispectral index-guided induction of general anaesthesia in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery using propofol or etomidate: a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial

被引:59
作者
Petrun, A. Moeller [1 ]
Kamenik, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Intens Care & Pain Management Univ Med Ctr Maribo, Dept Anaesthesiol, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
关键词
anaesthetics i.v; etomidate; propofol; consciousness monitors; bispectral index; heart; cardiac index; CARDIAC-OUTPUT; INFUSION; HYPOTENSION;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aes416
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
In a double-blind, randomized trial, we compared the haemodynamic effects of a bispectral index (BIS)-guided etomidate and propofol infusion for anaesthesia induction in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Forty-six patients were randomly assigned to two groups based on the induction of anaesthesia, performed with a BIS value of 60 titrated infusion of etomidate (E group) or propofol (P group). Mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac index (CI), heart rate, and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) measurements were taken 1 min before induction and recorded at 1-min intervals for 20 min. P0.05 was considered statistically significant. Before intubation, no significant differences between the two groups regarding the haemodynamics were noticed. At intubation and up to 7 min after intubation MAP (P0.019) was significantly higher in the E group. CI was significantly higher in the E group with respect to the P group 2, 6, and 7 min after intubation. Twenty-three patients developed complications. The incidence of hypotension was higher in the P group than that in the E group (8 vs 3; P0.08), and the incidence of hypertension was significantly higher in the E group than that in the P group (10 vs 2; P0.007). Our study showed that the use of propofol resulted in less hypertension and tachycardia at and after intubation than etomidate. But even with the reduced doses given with the BIS-guided protocol, it often caused significant hypotension.
引用
收藏
页码:388 / 396
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   The reliability of pulse contour-derived cardiac output during hemorrhage and after vasopressor administration [J].
Bein, Berthold ;
Meybohm, Patrick ;
Cavus, Erol ;
Renner, Jochen ;
Tonner, Peter H. ;
Steinfath, Markus ;
Scholz, Jens ;
Doerges, Volker .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 105 (01) :107-113
[2]   Propofol causes more hypotension than etomidate in patients with severe aortic stenosis:: a double-blind, randomized study comparing propofol and etomidate [J].
Bendel, S. ;
Ruokonen, E. ;
Polonen, P. ;
Uusaro, A. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 51 (03) :284-289
[3]   Uncalibrated pulse power analysis fails to reliably measure cardiac output in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery [J].
Broch, Ole ;
Renner, Jochen ;
Hoecker, Jan ;
Gruenewald, Matthias ;
Meybohm, Patrick ;
Schoettler, Jan ;
Steinfath, Markus ;
Bein, Berthold .
CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 15 (01)
[4]   Propofol infusion for induction and maintenance of anesthesia in elderly patients: Recovery and hemodynamic profiles [J].
Chan, VWS ;
Chung, FF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1996, 8 (04) :317-323
[5]   SYMPATHETIC RESPONSES TO INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA IN HUMANS WITH PROPOFOL OR ETOMIDATE [J].
EBERT, TJ ;
MUZI, M ;
BERENS, R ;
GOFF, D ;
KAMPINE, JP .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (05) :725-733
[6]   Clinical and Molecular Pharmacology of Etomidate [J].
Forman, Stuart A. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 114 (03) :695-707
[7]   Molecular targets underlying general anaesthesia [J].
Franks, NP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 147 :S72-S81
[8]  
FRYER M., 2004, ANAESTH INTENS CARE, V5, P317
[9]   ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF THE HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF PROPOFOL - A COMPARISON WITH ETOMIDATE AND THIOPENTONE [J].
GAUSS, A ;
HEINRICH, H ;
WILDERSMITH, OHG .
ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 46 (02) :99-105
[10]   THE EFFECTS OF SPEED OF INJECTION ON INDUCTION WITH PROPOFOL - A COMPARISON WITH ETOMIDATE [J].
GILLIES, GWA ;
LEES, NW .
ANAESTHESIA, 1989, 44 (05) :386-388