Gas hold-up in three phase co-current bubble columns

被引:27
|
作者
Kumar, S. [1 ]
Kumar, R. A. [1 ]
Munshi, P. [2 ]
Khanna, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] IIT Kanpur, Dept Chem Engn, Kanpur 208016, UP, India
[2] IIT Kanpur, Dept Mech Engn, Kanpur 208016, UP, India
来源
CHISA 2012 | 2012年 / 42卷
关键词
Bubble column; three phase flow; solid effect; co-current flows; gas hold-up; LIQUID-SOLID SUSPENSIONS; FLOW REGIME TRANSITION; ELEVATED PRESSURE; SLURRY CONCENTRATIONS; SPARGED REACTORS; RISE VELOCITY; HEAT-TRANSFER; HYDRODYNAMICS; DESIGN; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.470
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Bubble columns are used in a large number of applications in chemical engineering. The important variables that affect the gas holdup, bubble dynamics and flow regime in a bubble column are gas and liquid velocities, liquid viscosity, liquid surface tension, design of the gas distributor, solid concentration and column diameter. Experiments have been performed in a 15 cm diameter co-current slurry bubble column with liquid phase as water and air as the gas phase. Glass beads of mean diameter 35 mu m have been used as solid phase. Solid loading up to 9% has been used. The superficial gas velocity varies from 1.0 to 16.28 cm/s and superficial liquid velocity varies from 0 to 12.26 cm/s. Effects of liquid height, liquid velocity, gas velocity and solid concentration over gas holdup for both two and three phase co-current flows have been studied. For batch case the liquid height didn't affect the gas holdup. The gas holdup increases with increase in gas velocity for both two and three phase co-current columns. For two phase and three phase flow up to 1% solid loading; at low superficial gas velocity i.e. in the homogeneous regime, the increase in liquid velocity doesn't show any change in the gas holdup. For higher gas velocities i.e. in the heterogeneous regime, increase in liquid velocity decreases the gas holdup rapidly. Above 1% solid loading, liquid velocity effect over gas hold-up is negligible. With increase in solid concentration for co-current bubble column the gas holdup slightly increases or remains constant up to 5% loading; beyond this loading there is a significant decrease in gas holdup. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 794
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Experimental analysis and development of correlations for gas holdup in high pressure slurry co-current bubble columns
    Shyam Kumar
    Ashok Khanna
    Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2014, 31 : 1964 - 1972
  • [32] Local gas hold-up measurements in fluidized bed and slurry bubble column
    Schweitzer, JH
    Bayle, J
    Gauthier, T
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2001, 56 (03) : 1103 - 1110
  • [33] Prediction of gas hold-up in a bubble column filled with pure and binary liquids
    Syeda, SR
    Afacan, A
    Chuang, KT
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 80 (01) : 44 - 50
  • [34] A meta-analysis of empirical correlations for average gas hold-up in three-phase fluidized beds
    Mowla, Amir
    Treeratanaphitak, Tanyakarn
    Budman, Hector M.
    Abukhdeir, Nasser Mohieddin
    Ioannidis, Marios A.
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 301 : 590 - 595
  • [35] The gas-hold up in bubble columns (II). The influence of the electrical conductivity of the continuous phase
    Mihai, M
    Pincovschi, I
    REVISTA DE CHIMIE, 2004, 55 (03): : 198 - 203
  • [36] Effect of particles on bubble size distribution and gas hold-up in column flotation
    Vazirizadeh, Ali
    Bouchard, Jocelyn
    Chen, Yun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINERAL PROCESSING, 2016, 157 : 163 - 173
  • [37] Modeling of co-current and counter-current bubble columns with an extended EMMS approach
    Guan, Xiaoping
    Yang, Ning
    PARTICUOLOGY, 2019, 44 : 126 - 135
  • [38] Bubble Size and Radial Gas Hold-Up Distributions in a Slurry Bubble Column Using Ultrafast Electron Beam X-Ray Tomography
    Rabha, Swapna
    Schubert, Markus
    Wagner, Michael
    Lucas, Dirk
    Hampel, Uwe
    AICHE JOURNAL, 2013, 59 (05) : 1709 - 1722
  • [39] Gas hold up in bubble column at high pressure and high temperature
    Leonard, Clement
    Ferrasse, Jean-Henry
    Lefevre, Sebastien
    Viand, Alain
    Boutin, Olivier
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2019, 200 (186-202) : 186 - 202
  • [40] Development and validation of a comprehensive 1-D model to simulate gas hold-up and gas-liquid transfer in deep air-water bubble columns
    Larsson, Timo
    Quintero, Camilo Duran
    Gillot, Sylvie
    Cockx, Arnaud
    Fayolle, Yannick
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2022, 248