Gas hold-up in three phase co-current bubble columns

被引:27
|
作者
Kumar, S. [1 ]
Kumar, R. A. [1 ]
Munshi, P. [2 ]
Khanna, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] IIT Kanpur, Dept Chem Engn, Kanpur 208016, UP, India
[2] IIT Kanpur, Dept Mech Engn, Kanpur 208016, UP, India
来源
CHISA 2012 | 2012年 / 42卷
关键词
Bubble column; three phase flow; solid effect; co-current flows; gas hold-up; LIQUID-SOLID SUSPENSIONS; FLOW REGIME TRANSITION; ELEVATED PRESSURE; SLURRY CONCENTRATIONS; SPARGED REACTORS; RISE VELOCITY; HEAT-TRANSFER; HYDRODYNAMICS; DESIGN; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.470
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Bubble columns are used in a large number of applications in chemical engineering. The important variables that affect the gas holdup, bubble dynamics and flow regime in a bubble column are gas and liquid velocities, liquid viscosity, liquid surface tension, design of the gas distributor, solid concentration and column diameter. Experiments have been performed in a 15 cm diameter co-current slurry bubble column with liquid phase as water and air as the gas phase. Glass beads of mean diameter 35 mu m have been used as solid phase. Solid loading up to 9% has been used. The superficial gas velocity varies from 1.0 to 16.28 cm/s and superficial liquid velocity varies from 0 to 12.26 cm/s. Effects of liquid height, liquid velocity, gas velocity and solid concentration over gas holdup for both two and three phase co-current flows have been studied. For batch case the liquid height didn't affect the gas holdup. The gas holdup increases with increase in gas velocity for both two and three phase co-current columns. For two phase and three phase flow up to 1% solid loading; at low superficial gas velocity i.e. in the homogeneous regime, the increase in liquid velocity doesn't show any change in the gas holdup. For higher gas velocities i.e. in the heterogeneous regime, increase in liquid velocity decreases the gas holdup rapidly. Above 1% solid loading, liquid velocity effect over gas hold-up is negligible. With increase in solid concentration for co-current bubble column the gas holdup slightly increases or remains constant up to 5% loading; beyond this loading there is a significant decrease in gas holdup. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 794
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gas hold-up and mass transfer in a pilot scale bubble column with and without internals
    Manjrekar, Onkar N.
    Hamed, Mohamed
    Dudukouic, Milorad P.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2018, 135 : 166 - 174
  • [22] Predictive analysis of gas hold-up in bubble column using machine learning methods
    Hazare, Sumit R.
    Patil, Chinmay S.
    V. Vala, Shivam
    Joshi, Aniruddha J.
    Joshi, Jyeshtharaj B.
    Vitankar, Vivek S.
    Patwardhan, Ashwin W.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2022, 184 : 724 - 739
  • [23] Gas hold-up in a three-phase reciprocating plate column
    Nikolic, LB
    Nikolic, VD
    Veljkovic, VB
    Skala, DU
    JOURNAL OF THE SERBIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 70 (11) : 1363 - 1371
  • [24] Artificial neural networks modeling of ozone bubble columns: Mass transfer coefficient, gas hold-up, and bubble size
    Baawain, Mahad S.
    El-Din, Mohamed Gamal
    Smith, Daniel W.
    OZONE-SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2007, 29 (05) : 343 - 352
  • [25] Gamma ray tomography design for the measurement of hold-up profiles in two-phase bubble columns
    Veera, UP
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2001, 81 (1-3) : 251 - 260
  • [26] On the gas expansion and gas hold-up in vertical slugging columns - A simulation study
    Mayor, T. S.
    Pinto, A. M. F. R.
    Campos, J. B. L. M.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2008, 47 (05) : 799 - 815
  • [27] A novel sieve plate hole pattern: effect on gas hold-up and flow regimes in a bubble column
    Sanchez-Moran, Hector
    Terleira, Marina
    Diaz, M. Elena
    Montes, Francisco J.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 207 (12) : 1755 - 1768
  • [28] GAS HOLD-UP IN NON-NEWTONIAN SOLUTIONS IN A BUBBLE-COLUMN WITH INTERNALS
    PRADHAN, AK
    PARICHHA, RK
    DE, P
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1993, 71 (03) : 468 - 471
  • [29] A comparative study of gas hold-up, bubble size, interfacial area and mass transfer coefficients in stirred gas-liquid reactors and bubble columns
    Bouaifi, M
    Hebrard, G
    Bastoul, D
    Roustan, M
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2001, 40 (02) : 97 - 111
  • [30] Characterisation of bubble diameter and gas hold-up in simulated hydrocarbon-based bioprocesses in a bubble column reactor
    Abufalgha, Ayman A.
    Clarke, Kim G.
    Pott, Robert W. M.
    BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2020, 158