Experiment-based investigations on the effect of ignition energy on dust explosion behaviors

被引:50
作者
Kuai, Niansheng [1 ]
Huang, Weixing [1 ]
Du, Bing [1 ]
Yuan, Jingjie [1 ]
Li, Zongshan [1 ]
Gan, Yuan [1 ]
Tan, Jingyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Sch Chem Engn, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
关键词
Dust explosion; Ignition energy; Flammability limit; Under-driving; Over-driving; PARTICLE COMBUSTION; PHASE-CHANGES; EXPLOSIBILITY; ALUMINUM; TURBULENCE; PRESSURES; AEROSOL; HAZARD; FLAME; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2013.03.005
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Explosion behaviors of typical light metal and carbonaceous dusts induced by different ignition energies were investigated based on systematic experiments in a Siwek 20 L vessel. Comparative analysis reveals that the explosion mechanism of carbonaceous dust is the volatile combustion, whereas the mechanism for light metal dust mainly features the surface heterogeneous oxidation. Influences of ignition energy on severity and flammability limit are much more significant for carbonaceous dust than light metal, especially for the powder with less volatile. An innovative approach was introduced to derive flame thickness from the pressure-time trace. The relation between explosion induction time and combustion duration of ignitor was also analyzed. Results show inappropriate ignition energy will cause under-/over-driving in the thermodynamic/kinetic characteristic measurements. In this way, a dimensionless parameter pressure ratio was introduced to evaluate the under-driving, while two methods by using flame thickness and induction time respectively, were proposed to evaluate over-driving. To improve the accuracy of dust explosion tests, authors advocate that explosion severity determination should be conducted at the critical ignition energy. Moreover, a comparison between the European and Chinese flammability limit determination procedures was also conducted, indicating that EN 14034-3 is suitable for light metal but not for carbonaceous, while GB/T 16425 appears to be slightly conservative for both carbonaceous and light metal dusts. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:869 / 877
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Dust explosions - Cases, causes, consequences, and control [J].
Abbasi, Tasneem ;
Abbasi, S. A. .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2007, 140 (1-2) :7-44
[2]   A thermal analysis investigation of partially hydrolyzed starch [J].
Aggarwal, P ;
Dollimore, D .
THERMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1998, 319 (1-2) :17-25
[3]  
*ASTM, 2007, E1226 ASTM INT
[4]   Influence of the size distribution and concentration on wood dust explosion:: Experiments and reaction modelling [J].
Callé, S ;
Klaba, L ;
Thomas, D ;
Perrin, L ;
Dufaud, O .
POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 157 (1-3) :144-148
[5]   Explosion temperatures and pressures of metals and other elemental dust clouds [J].
Cashdollar, Kenneth L. ;
Zlochower, Isaac A. .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2007, 20 (4-6) :337-348
[6]   MINIMUM EXPLOSIBLE DUST CONCENTRATIONS MEASURED IN 20-L AND 1-M3 CHAMBERS [J].
CASHDOLLAR, KL ;
CHATRATHI, K .
COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 87 (1-6) :157-171
[7]   Coal dust explosibility [J].
Cashdollar, KL .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 1996, 9 (01) :65-76
[8]   Overview of dust explosibility characteristics [J].
Cashdollar, KL .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2000, 13 (3-5) :183-199
[9]  
*CEN TC, 2004, CENTC305 EUR COMM ST
[10]   A comparison of experimental methods to determine the minimum explosible concentration of dusts [J].
Chawla, N ;
Amyotte, PR ;
Pegg, MJ .
FUEL, 1996, 75 (06) :654-658