Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Patients with Hostile Neck Anatomy

被引:84
作者
Stather, P. W. [1 ]
Sayers, R. D. [1 ]
Cheah, A. [2 ]
Wild, J. B. [1 ]
Bown, M. J. [1 ]
Choke, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Dept Cardiovasc Sci, Vasc Surg Grp, Leicester LE2 7LX, Leics, England
[2] Leicester Royal Infirm, Dept Vasc Surg, Leicester LE1 5WW, Leics, England
关键词
Hostile neck anatomy; EVAR; Endovascular aneurysm repair; Instructions for use; Neck diameter; Neck angulation; Neck length; Neck flare; Neck thrombus; ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM; REPORTING STANDARDS; ENDOPROSTHESIS; ENLARGEMENT; SYSTEM; EVAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.10.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate outcomes following EVAR in patients with hostile neck anatomy (HNA). Methods: Data prospectively collected from 552 elective EVARs were analysed, retrospectively. Data regarding neck morphology was obtained from aneurysm stent plans produced prior to EVAR. HNA was defined as any of neck diameter >28 mm, neck angulation >60 degrees neck length <15 mm, neck thrombus, or neck flare. Results: 552 patients underwent EVAR. Mean age 73.9 years, mean follow-up 4.1 years 199 patient had HNA, 353 had favourable neck anatomy (FNA). There was a significant increase in late type I endoleaks (FNA 4.5%, HNA 9.5%; P = 0.02) and total reinterventions (FNA 11.0%, HNA 22.8%; P < 0.01), and a significant decrease in late type II endoleaks in patients with HNA (FNA 16.7%, HNA 10.6%; P < 0.65). There was no significant difference in technical success (FNA, 0.6%, HNA 2.0%; p = 0.12); 30-day re-intervention (FNA 2.8%, HNA 5.0%; P = 0.12), 30-day mortality (FNA 1.1%, HNA 0.5%; P = 0.45), 30-day type I endoleaks (FNA 0.8%, HNA 2.5%; P = 0.12), 5-year mortality (FNA 15.1% HNA 14.6%; P = 0.86), aneurysm-related mortality (FNA 1.7% versus HNA 2.0%; P = 09), stent-graft migration (FNA 2.5%, HNA 3.6%; P = 0.75), sac expansion (FNA 13.0%, HNA 9.5%; P = 0.22), or graft rupture (FNA 1.1%, HNA 3.5%; P = 0.05). Binary logistic regression of individual features of HNA revealed secondary intervention (P = 0.009), technical failure (P = 0.02), and late type I endoleaks (P = 0.002), were significantly increased with increased neck diameter. Conclusions: HNA AAAs can be successfully treated with EVAR. However, surveillance necessary to detect and treat late type I endoleaks in HNA patients. (c) 2012 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 561
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Outcomes following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR): An anatomic and device-specific analysis [J].
Abbruzzese, Thomas A. ;
Kwolck, Christopher J. ;
Brewster, David C. ;
Chung, Thomas K. ;
Kang, Jeanwan ;
Conrad, Mark F. ;
LaMuraglia, Glenn M. ;
Cambria, Richard P. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 48 (01) :19-28
[2]   Clinical outcomes for hostile versus favorable aortic neck anatomy in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using modular devices [J].
AbuRahma, Ali F. ;
Campbell, John E. ;
Mousa, Albeir Y. ;
Hass, Stephen M. ;
Stone, Patrick A. ;
Jain, Akhilesh ;
Nanjundappa, Aravinda ;
Dean, L. Scott ;
Keiffer, Tammi ;
Habib, Joseph .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 54 (01) :13-21
[3]   The correlation of aortic neck length to early and late outcomes in endovascular aneurysm repair patients [J].
AbuRahma, Ali F. ;
Campbell, John ;
Stone, Patrick A. ;
Nanjundappa, Aravinda ;
Jain, Akhilesh ;
Dean, L. Scott ;
Habib, Joseph ;
Keiffer, Tammi ;
Emmett, Mary .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 (04) :738-748
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ABD AORT AN END STEN
[5]   A model to predict outcomes for endovascular aneurysm repair using preoperative variables [J].
Barnes, M. ;
Boult, M. ;
Maddern, G. ;
Fitridge, R. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 35 (05) :571-579
[6]   Abdominal aortic aneurysm size regression after endovascular repair is endograft dependent [J].
Bertges, DJ ;
Chow, K ;
Wyers, MC ;
Landsittel, D ;
Frydrych, AV ;
Stavropoulos, W ;
Tan, WA ;
Rhee, RY ;
Fillinger, MF ;
Fairman, RM ;
Makaroun, MS .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 37 (04) :716-723
[7]   Pragmatic Minimum Reporting Standards for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair [J].
Boyle, Jonathan R. ;
Thompson, Matt M. ;
Vallabhaneni, S. Rao ;
Bell, Rachael E. ;
Brennan, John A. ;
Browne, Tom F. ;
Cheshire, Nicholas J. ;
Hinchliffe, Robert J. ;
Jenkins, Michael P. ;
Loftus, Ian M. ;
Macdonald, Sumaira ;
McCarthy, Mark J. ;
McWilliams, Richard G. ;
Morgan, Robert A. ;
Oshin, Olufemi A. ;
Pemberton, R. Mark ;
Pillay, Woolagasen R. ;
Sayers, Robert D. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2011, 18 (03) :263-271
[8]   Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Chaikof, EL ;
Blankensteijn, JD ;
Harris, PL ;
White, GH ;
Zarins, CK ;
Bernhard, VM ;
Matsumura, JS ;
May, J ;
Veith, FJ ;
Fillinger, MF ;
Rutherford, RB ;
Kent, KC .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (05) :1048-1060
[9]   Late abdominal aortic aneurysm enlargement after endovascular repair with the excluder device [J].
Cho, JS ;
Dillavou, ED ;
Rhee, RY ;
Makaroun, AS .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 39 (06) :1236-1241
[10]   Outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile neck anatomy [J].
Choke, Edward ;
Munneke, Graham ;
Morgan, Robert ;
Belli, Anna-Maria ;
Loftus, Ian ;
McFarland, Robert ;
Loosemore, Thomas ;
Thompson, Matthew M. .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 29 (06) :975-980