Trends and geographical variation of primary hip and knee joint replacement in Germany

被引:59
作者
Schaefer, T. [1 ,2 ]
Pritzkuleit, R. [3 ]
Jeszenszky, C. [4 ]
Malzahn, J. [5 ]
Maier, W. [6 ]
Guenther, K. P. [4 ]
Niethard, E. [7 ]
机构
[1] Private Practice, Immenstadt, Germany
[2] German Soc Orthopaed & Orthopaed Surg, Immenstadt, Germany
[3] Univ Lubeck, Inst Canc Epidemiol, Lubeck, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Med, Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Carus, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Dresden, Germany
[5] Fed Assoc AOK Local Social Hlth Insurance Funds, Berlin, Germany
[6] German Res Ctr Environm Hlth GmbH, Inst Hlth Econ & Hlth Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen, Neuherberg, Germany
[7] German Soc Orthopaed & Orthopaed Surg, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Hip replacement; Knee replacement; Geographical variation; Health services research; SPATIAL ASSOCIATION; POPULATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; ARTHROPLASTY; PREVALENCE; RATES; PROVISION; STATE; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.joca.2012.11.006
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Considerable variation in total hip replacement and total knee replacement (THR/TKR) between regions has been described. The aim of this study was to explore geographical variation in THR and TKR in Germany and to analyse potentially explanatory variables. Method: We used data of Germany's largest statutory health insurer. Between 2005 and 2009 451,108 THR and 335,022 TKR were performed. Age-standardised joint replacement rates were calculated for 16 federal states and 407 counties. We performed cluster (Moran's I) and spatial error regression analyses including regional deprivation, osteoarthritis rate, urbanity and number of orthopaedic specialists as dependent variables on county level. Results: In 2009 the overall age-standardised and crude rates were 148.9 (95% CI (confidence interval) 147.6-151.1) and 290.2 for THR, and 132.5 (95% CI 131.3-133.6) and 232.7 for TKR. Between counties THR rates differed by factor 2 (106.1-215.8) and showed significant clusters with high utilisation in South and Northwest Germany. TKR rates differed by factor 3.2 (69.1-219.5) and were also high in South Germany whereas almost all areas in East Germany showed low replacement rates. Differences were pronounced when restricting the analysis to cases with an indication of osteoarthritis. All tested predictors could be identified as significant explanatory variables (each P < 0.001). Conclusion: This study proofed considerable and consistent geographic variation of THR and TKR in Germany. Thereby relevant explanatory factors were identified. These results may foster the discussion and future research in health services which should include areas of patients' and doctors' expectation, financial aspects and an outcome-based definition of appropriate supply. (C) 2012 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 288
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Tranexamic Acid Prophylaxis in Hip and Knee Joint Replacement
    Goldstein, Matthias
    Feldmann, Carsten
    Wulf, Hinnerk
    Wiesmann, Thomas
    [J]. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 114 (48): : 824 - +
  • [22] Perceptions of Physician Recommendations for Joint Replacement Surgery in Older Patients with Severe Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis
    Schonberg, Mara A.
    Marcantonio, Edward R.
    Hamel, Mary Beth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2009, 57 (01) : 82 - 88
  • [23] Factors associated with persistent postsurgical pain after total knee or hip joint replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ghoshal, Arunangshu
    Bhanvadia, Shivam
    Singh, Som
    Yaeger, Lauren
    Haroutounian, Simon
    [J]. PAIN REPORTS, 2023, 8 (01) : E1052
  • [24] Vascular Injuries During Hip and Knee Replacement
    Street, Matthew W. J.
    Howard, Lisa C.
    Neufeld, Michael E.
    Masri, Bassam A.
    [J]. ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2022, 53 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [25] Demographic and geographical variability in physiotherapy provision following hip and knee replacement. An analysis from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man
    Smith, Toby O.
    Dainty, Jack R.
    Clark, Emma M.
    Whitehouse, Michael R.
    Price, Andrew J.
    MacGregor, Alex J.
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2020, 106 : 1 - 11
  • [26] Who should have knee joint replacement surgery for osteoarthritis?
    Dieppe, Paul
    Lim, Keith
    Lohmander, Stefan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2011, 14 (02) : 175 - 180
  • [27] Impact of patient comorbidities on surgical site infection within 90 days of primary and revision joint (hip and knee) replacement
    Edmiston, Charles E., Jr.
    Chitnis, Abhishek S.
    Lerner, Jason
    Folly, Ekoue
    Holy, Chantal E.
    Leaper, David
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2019, 47 (10) : 1225 - 1232
  • [28] Physical Activity Interventions After Hip or Knee Joint Replacement: a Systematic Review
    Timothy Ishaku
    Shi-Mah Min
    Michelle Hall
    [J]. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, 2020, 8 : 299 - 311
  • [29] Knee and Hip Joint Replacement Surgery in a Patient with Ochronotic Arthropathy: Surgical Tips
    Mazoochy, Hamed
    Razi, Mohammad
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2018, 6 (06): : 577 - 581
  • [30] Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery
    Beard, David J.
    Harris, Kristina
    Dawson, Jill
    Doll, Helen
    Murray, David W.
    Carr, Andrew J.
    Price, Andrew J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (01) : 73 - 79