Interspinous implant in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort

被引:5
作者
Bhadra, Arup Kumar [1 ]
Raman, A. S. [1 ]
Tucker, S. [1 ]
Noordeen, H. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, Stanmore HA7 4LP, Middx, England
关键词
lumbar spinal stenosis; neurogenic claudication; distractor; efficacy;
D O I
10.1007/s00590-008-0340-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study design Prospective study on clinical outcome of interspinous process distraction with X-STOP in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Purpose To determine the safety and efficacy of X-STOP interspinous distractor. Method A total of 45 patients (24 males, 21 females) with lumbar spinal stenosis were treated with X-STOP system. They had preoperative and postoperative (3, 6 and 12 months) assessments using the Back and Sciatica Questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the SF12 Questionnaire. Patient satisfaction was assessed at each visit. Results The average VAS of back and leg pain was 6.7 and 6.8 preoperatively and improved to 2.7 and 2.8 postoperatively. A total of 68% had improvement in their walking distance following the operation. The average preoperative ODI of 42% improved to 16.38% postoperatively (P < 0.0001). A total of 70% of patients had improvement in physical score and 80% in mental score. A total of 82% were very satisfied with the outcome of the operation. Conclusion X-STOP implant is clinically effective with fewer complications and it is a simple procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 493
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Surgical outcome of 438 patients treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosis [J].
Airaksinen, O ;
Herno, A ;
Turunen, V ;
Saari, T ;
Suomlainen, O .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (19) :2278-2282
[2]  
Alvarez JA, 1998, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V57, P1825
[3]  
BENZ RJ, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V384, P116
[4]   Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis - A systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests [J].
de Graaf, I ;
Prak, A ;
Bierma-Zeinstra, S ;
Thomas, S ;
Peul, W ;
Koes, B .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (10) :1168-1176
[5]  
Epstein NE, 1998, SURG NEUROL, V50, P3
[6]   Long-term outcome of laminectomy for spinal stenosis in octogenarians [J].
Galiano, K ;
Obwegeser, AA ;
Gabl, MV ;
Bauer, R ;
Twerdy, K .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (03) :332-335
[7]   A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine [J].
Guiot, BH ;
Khoo, LT ;
Fessler, RG .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (04) :432-438
[8]   Clinical and psychofunctional measures of conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study [J].
Gunzburg, R ;
Keller, TS ;
Szpalski, M ;
Vandeputte, K ;
Spratt, KF .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2003, 12 (02) :197-204
[9]   LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS - CLINICAL-FEATURES, DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES, AND RESULTS OF SURGICAL-TREATMENT IN 68 PATIENTS [J].
HALL, S ;
BARTLESON, JD ;
ONOFRIO, BM ;
BAKER, HL ;
OKAZAKI, H ;
ODUFFY, JD .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1985, 103 (02) :271-275
[10]   THE EFFECT OF DECOMPRESSION ON THE NATURAL COURSE OF SPINAL STENOSIS - A COMPARISON OF SURGICALLY TREATED AND UNTREATED PATIENTS [J].
JOHNSSON, KE ;
UDEN, A ;
ROSEN, I .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (06) :615-619