Circadian response of annual weeds to glyphosate and glufosinate

被引:27
|
作者
Martinson, KB
Sothern, RB
Koukkari, WL
Durgan, BR
Gunsolus, JL
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Coll Agr Food & Environm Sci, Dept Agron & Plant Genet, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Coll Biol Sci, Dept Plant Biol, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
glyphosate; glufosinate; herbicide; circadian rhythm; chronotoxicity; annual weeds;
D O I
10.1081/CBI-120002877
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Five field experiments were conducted in 1998 and 1999 in Minnesota to examine the influence of time of day efficacy of glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] and glufosinate [2-amino-4-(hydroxymethyl-phosphinyl)butanoic acid] applications on the control of annual weeds. Each experiment was designed to be a randomized complete block with four replications using plot sizes of 3 X 9 m. Glyphosate and glufosinate were applied at rates of 0.421 kg ae/ha and 0.292 kg ai/ha, respectively, with and without an additional adjuvant that consisted of 20% nonionic surfactant and 80% ammonium sulfate. All treatments were applied with water at 94 L/ha. Times of day for the application of herbicide were 06:00h, 09:00h, 12:00h, 15:00h, 18:00h, 21:00h, and 24:00h. Efficacy was evaluated 14 d after application by visual ratings. At 14 d, a circadian response to each herbicide was found, with greatest annual weed control observed with an application occurring between 09:00h and 18:00h and significantly less weed control observed with an application at 06:00h, 21:00h, or 24:00h. The addition of an adjuvant to both herbicides increased overall efficacy, but did not overcome the rhythmic time of day effect. Results of the multiple regression analysis showed that after environmental temperature, time of day was the second most important predictor of percent weed kill. Thus, circadian timing of herbicide application significantly influenced weed control with both glyphosate and glufosinate.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 422
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Circadian response of annual weeds to glyphosate and glufosinate (vol 19, pg 405, 2002)
    Martinson, KB
    Sothern, RB
    Koukkari, WL
    Durgan, BR
    Gunsolus, JL
    CHRONOBIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 19 (04) : 805 - 806
  • [2] Response of annual weed species to glufosinate and glyphosate
    Tharp, BE
    Schabenberger, O
    Kells, JJ
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 13 (03) : 542 - 547
  • [3] Control of annual weeds with glyphosate
    Krausz, RF
    Kapusta, G
    Matthews, JL
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 10 (04) : 957 - 962
  • [4] MSMA antagonizes glyphosate and glufosinate efficacy on broadleaf and grass weeds
    Koger, Clifford H.
    Burke, Ian C.
    Miller, Donnie K.
    Kendig, J. Andrew
    Reddy, Krishna N.
    Wilcut, John W.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 21 (01) : 159 - 165
  • [5] Evaluation of glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays) and glufosinate:: Efficacy on annual weeds
    Krausz, RF
    Kapusta, G
    Matthews, JL
    Baldwin, JL
    Maschoff, J
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 13 (04) : 691 - 696
  • [6] Glufosinate efficacy on annual weeds is influenced by rate and growth stage
    Steckel, GJ
    Wax, LM
    Simmons, FW
    Phillips, WH
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 11 (03) : 484 - 488
  • [7] Influence of Glyphosate or Glufosinate Combinations with Growth Regulator Herbicides and Other Agrochemicals in Controlling Glyphosate-Resistant Weeds
    Chahal, Gurinderbir S.
    Johnson, William G.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 26 (04) : 638 - 643
  • [8] Interactions between glyphosate and imazethapyr on four annual weeds
    Li, JM
    Johnson, WG
    Smeda, RJ
    CROP PROTECTION, 2002, 21 (10) : 1087 - 1092
  • [9] Response of wheat (Tritium aestivum) to low rates of glyphosate and glufosinate
    Davis, Brad
    Scott, Robert C.
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    Gbur, Ed
    CROP PROTECTION, 2013, 54 : 181 - 184
  • [10] Response of Rice (Oryza sativa) to Low Rates of Glyphosate and Glufosinate
    Davis, Brad
    Scott, Robert C.
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    Gbur, Edward
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 25 (02) : 198 - 203