Changes in views on digital intraoral scanners among dental hygienists after training in digital impression taking

被引:37
作者
Park, Hye-Ran [1 ]
Park, Ji-Man [2 ,3 ]
Chun, Youn-Sic [4 ]
Lee, Kkot-Nim [1 ]
Kim, Minji [4 ]
机构
[1] Ewha Womans Univ, Grad Sch Clin Dent, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Gwanak Dent Hosp, Dept Prosthodont, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Gwanak Dent Hosp, Dent Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Ewha Womans Univ, Grad Sch Clin Dent, Dept Orthodont, Mokdong Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Digital intraoral scanner; Perception of digital impression; Training of intraoral scanner; IMPLANT IMPRESSIONS; TRAY SELECTION; ACCURACY; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-015-0140-5
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Backgrounds: Despite the rapid development of digital dentistry, the use of digital intraoral scanners remains limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in views on intraoral scanners among dental hygienists after training. Methods: Thirty-four dental hygienists with >3 years of clinical experience participated and were divided into 2 groups : iTero and Trios groups. Participants of each group practiced the usage of both intraoral scanners, for total 12 times over 4 sessions, Questionnaires were given to participants at two different times; prior to and after the completion of the training sessions. The parameters of questionnaires included on difficulty of use, patient discomfort, awareness, preference, and clinical usefulness of intraoral scanners and comparison of two types of scanners. Results: Upon the completion of the training, both iTero and Trios groups gave positive feedback on anticipated accuracy, efficiency, and clinical usefulness. More participants of the iTero group responded that the level of difficulty of use and patient discomfort was greater than Trios. Both groups preferred Trios for its clinical usefulness. Conclusions: The perceptions of dental hygienists on usage of intraoral scanner and digital impression improved positively with the training. The participants favored Trios over iTero in terms of difficulty of use, patient comfort, and clinical usefulness. This study showed that appropriate training could change the views on the efficiency of intraoral scanners positively among dental hygienists.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Ann JW, 2015, KOREAN J OR IN PRESS
[2]   Laser digitization of casts to determine the effect of tray selection and cast formation technique on accuracy [J].
Brosky, ME ;
Pesun, IJ ;
Lowder, PD ;
DeLong, R ;
Hodges, JS .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2002, 87 (02) :204-209
[3]   Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays [J].
Burns, J ;
Palmer, R ;
Howe, L ;
Wilson, R .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 89 (03) :250-255
[4]   The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions [J].
Ceyhan, JA ;
Johnson, GH ;
Lepe, X .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 90 (02) :143-149
[5]   Impressions are changing Deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling [J].
Christensen, Gordon J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 140 (10) :1301-1304
[6]  
Ender A, 2013, INT J COMPUT DENT, V16, P11
[7]   Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures [J].
Herbst, D ;
Nel, JC ;
Driessen, CH ;
Becker, PJ .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2000, 83 (05) :555-561
[8]  
Keating AP, 2008, J ORTHOD, V35, P191, DOI 10.1179/146531207225022626
[9]  
최호식, 2012, [The Journal of the Korean Dental Association, 대한치과의사협회지], V50, P110
[10]  
Kugel Gerard, 2014, Compend Contin Educ Dent, V35, P202