Does gender influence how patients rate their patient experience after total hip arthroplasty?

被引:34
作者
Delanois, Ronald E. [1 ]
Gwam, Chukwuweike U. [1 ]
Mistry, Jaydev B. [1 ]
Chughtai, Morad [2 ]
Khlopas, Anton [2 ]
Yakubek, George [2 ]
Ramkumar, Prem N. [2 ]
Piuzzi, Nicolas S. [2 ]
Mont, Michael A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sinai Hosp, Ctr Joint Preservat & Reconstruct, Rubin Inst Adv Orthopaed, 2401 W Belvedere Ave, Baltimore, MD 21215 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Gender; Patient satisfaction; Press Ganey; Reimbursement; Total hip arthroplasty; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; PAIN MANAGEMENT; REVISION HIP; REPLACEMENT; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.5301/hipint.5000510
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patient satisfaction, as measured by Press Ganey (PG) surveys, partially determines reimbursement rates. Knowing what influences these scores can lead to higher reimbursement for total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgeons. Currently, it is unknown whether gender biases exist in satisfaction surveys post-THA. Therefore, we asked: (i) which PG survey factors most influence hospital ratings among men and women after THA; and (ii) is there a difference in survey element responses and overall hospital ratings between men and women post-THA? Methods: We queried the PG database for patients who underwent THA from November 2009 to January 2015, which yielded 692 patients (277 men, 415 women). Weighted means were analysed for the scores of PG domains between men and women. A multiple regression analysis was performed for each gender, with overall hospital satisfaction as the dependent variable, in order to assess the influence (beta-weight) of each PG domain. Results: For men, pain management (beta = 0.317, p = 0.021) most influenced overall hospital rating. For women, staff responsiveness (beta = 0.451, p<0.001) most influenced overall hospital rating. This was followed by communication with nurses (beta = 0.373, p<0.001), and doctors (beta = 0.236, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in mean overall hospital rating between groups. Conclusions: It is advantageous for orthopaedic surgeons to focus on the PG domains most pertinent to each patient gender post-THA. Focusing efforts based on gender may allow for better patient satisfaction, optimised reimbursements, and improved hospital ratings.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 43
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, HOSP VAL BAS PURCH
[2]   Sex-related differences in pain [J].
Cairns, Brian E. ;
Gazerani, Parisa .
MATURITAS, 2009, 63 (04) :292-296
[3]  
Centers for Disease Control (CDC), 2010, NAT HOSP DISCH SURV
[4]  
Chughtai Morad, 2016, Surg Technol Int, V28, P261
[5]   Analysis of the outcome in male and female patients using a unisex total knee replacement system [J].
Dalury, D. F. ;
Mason, J. B. ;
Murphy, J. A. ;
Adams, M. J. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2009, 91B (03) :357-360
[6]   Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement [J].
Dawson, J ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Frost, S ;
Gundle, R ;
McLardy-Smith, P ;
Murray, D .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2001, 83B (08) :1125-1129
[7]   DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN UNDERGOING MAJOR ORTHOPEDIC-SURGERY FOR DEGENERATIVE ARTHRITIS [J].
KATZ, JN ;
WRIGHT, EA ;
GUADAGNOLI, E ;
LIANG, MH ;
KARLSON, EW ;
CLEARY, PD .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1994, 37 (05) :687-694
[8]  
Kinney Eleanor D, 2013, Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics, V13, P253
[9]   Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 [J].
Kurtz, Steven ;
Ong, Kevin ;
Lau, Edmund ;
Mowat, Fionna ;
Halpern, Michael .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (04) :780-785
[10]   Optimizing Patient/Caregiver Satisfaction Through Quality of Communication in the Pediatric Emergency Department [J].
Locke, Robert ;
Stefano, Mariane ;
Koster, Alex ;
Taylor, Beth ;
Greenspan, Jay .
PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2011, 27 (11) :1016-1021