Economic Success of Physicians in the Online Consultation Market: A Signaling Theory Perspective

被引:94
作者
Li, Jia [1 ]
Tang, Jie [2 ]
Jiang, Ling [2 ]
Yen, David C. [3 ]
Liu, Xuan [1 ]
机构
[1] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Inst DataSci & Business Intelligence, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] SUNY Coll Oneonta, Sch Econ & Business, Management Informat Syst, Oneonta, NY 13820 USA
关键词
E-healthcare; electronic consultation; knowledge contribution; medical consultation; reputation; physician income; signaling theory; status; WORD-OF-MOUTH; PRODUCT QUALITY; SOCIAL PROOF; KNOWLEDGE; IMPACT; INFORMATION; PARTICIPATION; COMMUNITIES; PERCEPTIONS; INTEGRATION;
D O I
10.1080/10864415.2018.1564552
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
E-consultation is considerably significant in today's highly competitive environment in reducing medical costs, improving operational efficiency and effectiveness, enhancing the equity of medical resources, and meeting customers' satisfaction. However, the prosperity of e-consultation depends on doctors' consistent participation and continued contribution. In addition, receiving a monetary return may be deemed as one of the major factors for doctors to stay on e-consultation platforms and provide the needed online services. This study investigates how a physician can achieve economic success in the online consultation market from the perspective of signaling theory. A secondary data econometric analysis using transaction data obtained from an e-consultation Website (haodf.com) was conducted. The obtained results indicate that both seller signals (knowledge contribution) and market signals (reputation), which are observable from the Website, may positively affect physicians' income. In fact, the two types of online signals are the substitutes for each other; in addition, the impacts of both seller signals (knowledge contribution) and market signals (reputation) obtained from the Website were negatively moderated (weakened) by the offline signals (status). This study contributes to the literature by making a clear distinction between the online and offline signals, as well as between the seller signals and market signals. This study also provides practical implications, indicating that knowledge contribution and reputation are two important factors for physicians to increase their online income.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 271
页数:28
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Al-Busaidi K.A., 2010, J ORG KNOWLEDGE MANA, V2010, P928
[3]   Harnessing the Influence of Social Proof in Online Shopping: The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales of Digital Microproducts [J].
Amblee, Naveen ;
Bui, Tung .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, 2011, 16 (02) :91-113
[4]   The Digitization of Healthcare: Boundary Risks, Emotion, and Consumer Willingness to Disclose Personal Health Information [J].
Anderson, Catherine L. ;
Agarwal, Ritu .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (03) :469-490
[5]   The Signaling Role of IT Features in Influencing Trust and Participation in Online Communities [J].
Benlian, Alexander ;
Hess, Thomas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, 2011, 15 (04) :7-56
[6]   Who Uses eConsult? Investigating Physician Characteristics Associated with Usage (and Nonusage) [J].
Bilodeau, Howard ;
Armstrong, Catherine Deri ;
Keely, Erin ;
Liddy, Clare .
TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2018, 24 (07) :497-503
[7]   Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital [J].
Bird, RB ;
Smith, EA .
CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY, 2005, 46 (02) :221-248
[8]   A CONSUMER-SIDE EXPERIMENTAL EXAMINATION OF SIGNALING THEORY - DO CONSUMERS PERCEIVE WARRANTIES AS SIGNALS OF QUALITY [J].
BOULDING, W ;
KIRMANI, A .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1993, 20 (01) :111-123
[9]   Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures [J].
Certo, ST .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (03) :432-446
[10]   Temporal Contiguity and Negativity Bias in the Impact of Online Word of Mouth [J].
Chen, Zoey ;
Lurie, Nicholas H. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2013, 50 (04) :463-476