Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm

被引:61
作者
Sener, Nevzat Can [1 ]
Imamoglu, M. Abdurrahim [2 ]
Bas, Okan [3 ]
Ozturk, Ufuk [2 ]
Goktug, H. N. Goksel [2 ]
Tuygun, Can [2 ]
Bakirtas, Hasan [2 ]
机构
[1] Numune Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Minist Hlth, Adana, Turkey
[2] Diskapi Yildirim Beyazid Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Minist Hlth, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Onkol Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Minist Hlth, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
SWL; F-URS; Lower pole stone; RENAL-CALCULI; MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS; CALICEAL CALCULI; IN-SITU; URETEROSCOPY; ANATOMY; ESWL;
D O I
10.1007/s00240-013-0618-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In this study, we aimed to compare the success and complications of flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with its advanced technology and the accomplished method of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in the treatment of lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm. One hundred and forty patients were randomized as 70 undergoing SWL (Group 1) and 70 undergoing F-URS (Group 2). Patients were evaluated by plain X-ray and urinary ultrasound 1 week and after 3 months following SWL. The same procedure was done for F-URS patients 1 week after surgery and after 3 months. Success rates were established the day following the procedure and after 3 months. Fragmentation less than 3 mm was considered success. Mean operative time was 44 +/- A 7.4 min for Group 2 and mean fluoroscopy duration was 51 +/- A 12 s. In F-URS group, all the patients were stone free after 3 months (100 %). Group 1 had 2.7 +/- A 0.4 sessions of SWL. Sixty-four patients were stone free in that group after 3 months (91.5 %). The procedure yielded significant success in FURS group, even though patients underwent SWL for 2.7 +/- A 0.4 sessions and F-URS for 1 session (p < 0.05). With higher success and similar complication rates, fewer sessions per treatment, and advances in technology and experience, we believe F-URS has a potential to be the first treatment option over SWL in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 131
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY FOR LARGE RENAL CALCULI - THE ROLE OF URETERAL STENTS - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
BIERKENS, AF ;
HENDRIKX, AJM ;
LEMMENS, WAJG ;
DEBRUYNE, FMJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (04) :699-702
[2]   Complications of Extracorporeal ShockWave Lithotripsy for Urinary Stones: To Know and toManage Them-A Review [J].
D'Addessi, Alessandro ;
Vittori, Matteo ;
Racioppi, Marco ;
Pinto, Francesco ;
Sacco, Emilio ;
Bassi, PierFrancesco .
SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2012, :1-6
[3]   Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower calyx calculi:: How much is treatment outcome influenced by the anatomy of the collecting system? [J].
Danuser, Hansjoerg ;
Mueller, Roger ;
Descoeudres, Bernard ;
Dobry, Eduard ;
Studer, Urs E. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 52 (02) :539-546
[4]   A multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with subcapsular hematoma formation following electromagnetic shock wave lithotripsy [J].
Dhar, NB ;
Thornton, J ;
Karafa, MT ;
Streem, SB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (06) :2271-2274
[5]  
Doddamani D, 2011, Med J Armed Forces India, V67, P217, DOI 10.1016/S0377-1237(11)60044-0
[6]   Predictors of success after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for renal calculi between 20-30 mm: A multivariate analysis model [J].
El-Assmy, Ahmed ;
El-Nahas, Ahmed R. ;
Abo-Elghar, Mohamed E. ;
Eraky, Ibrahim ;
El-Kenawy, Mahmoud R. ;
Sheir, Khaled Z. .
THESCIENTIFICWORLDJOURNAL, 2006, 6 :2388-2395
[7]   Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm [J].
El-Nahas, Ahmed R. ;
Ibrahim, Hamdy M. ;
Youssef, Ramy F. ;
Sheir, Khaled Z. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (06) :898-902
[8]   Complications of 2735 retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy procedures: A single-center experience [J].
Geavlete, P ;
Georgescu, D ;
Nita, G ;
Mirciulescu, V ;
Cauni, V .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 (03) :179-185
[9]   Retrograde ureteropyeloscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi [J].
Grasso, M ;
Ficazzola, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (06) :1904-1908
[10]   Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones [J].
Hautmann, S ;
Friedrich, MG ;
Fernandez, S ;
Steuber, T ;
Hammerer, P ;
Braun, PM ;
Jünemann, KP ;
Huland, H .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2004, 73 (03) :238-243