Importance of diameter-to-length ratio in selecting dental implants: a methodological finite element study

被引:32
作者
Demenko, V. [1 ]
Linetskiy, I. [2 ]
Nesvit, K. [3 ]
Hubalkova, H. [2 ]
Nesvit, V. [4 ]
Shevchenko, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Aerosp Univ, Dept Aircraft Strength, Kharkov, Ukraine
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 1, Dept Stomatol, Prague, Czech Republic
[3] Natl Univ, Fac Math & Mech, Kharkov, Ukraine
[4] Natl Aerosp Univ, Dept Space Vehicle Design, Kharkov, Ukraine
关键词
dental implant; diameter-to-length ratio; implant-bone interface; masticatory load; von Mises stress; STRESS-DISTRIBUTION; BONE QUALITY; OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; BIOMECHANICS; PROSTHESES; GEOMETRY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/10255842.2012.688110
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Implant dimensions greatly influence load transfer characteristics and the lifetime of a dental system. Excessive stresses at pen-implant area may result in bone failure. Finding the critical point at the implant-bone interface and evaluating the influence of implant diameter-to-length ratio on adjacent bone stresses makes it possible to select implant dimensions. For this, different cylindrical implants were numerically analysed using geometrical models generated from computed tomography images of mandible with osseointegrated implants. All materials were assumed to be linearly elastic and isotropic. Masticatory load was applied in its natural direction, oblique to occlusal plane. Maximum von Mises stresses were located around the implant neck at the critical point of its intersection with the plane of loading and were functions of implant diameter-to-length ratio. It was demonstrated that there exists a certain spectrum of diameter-to-length ratios, which will keep maximum bone stresses at a preset level chosen in accordance with patient's bone strength.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 449
页数:7
相关论文
共 49 条
[21]   Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution:: A finite element analysis [J].
Himmlová, L ;
Dostálová, T ;
Kácovsky, A ;
Konvicková, S .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2004, 91 (01) :20-25
[22]  
Holmes D C, 1997, J Oral Implantol, V23, P104
[23]  
Holmgren E P, 1998, J Oral Implantol, V24, P80, DOI 10.1563/1548-1336(1998)024<0080:EPOODI>2.3.CO
[24]  
2
[25]   Biomechanical stress in bone surrounding an implant under simulated chewing [J].
Ishigaki, S ;
Nakano, T ;
Yamada, S ;
Nakamura, T ;
Takashima, F .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2003, 14 (01) :97-102
[26]   Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviors of dental implant using finite element method [J].
Kayabasi, Oguz ;
Yuezbasioglu, Emir ;
Erzincanli, Fehmi .
ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2006, 37 (10) :649-658
[27]  
Lekholm U., 1985, TISSUE INTEGRATED PR
[28]  
Lemons J., 1999, Contemporary implant dentistry, V2nd, P271
[29]   STRESS-DISTRIBUTION AROUND DENTAL IMPLANTS - INFLUENCE OF SUPERSTRUCTURE, LENGTH OF IMPLANTS, AND HEIGHT OF MANDIBLE [J].
MEIJER, HJA ;
KUIPER, JH ;
STARMANS, FJM ;
BOSMAN, F .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1992, 68 (01) :96-102
[30]   A 3-DIMENSIONAL, FINITE-ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF BONE AROUND DENTAL IMPLANTS IN AN EDENTULOUS HUMAN MANDIBLE [J].
MEIJER, HJA ;
STARMANS, FJM ;
STEEN, WHA ;
BOSMAN, F .
ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 1993, 38 (06) :491-496