Technological factors and total factor productivity in China: Evidence based on a panel threshold model

被引:112
作者
Huang, Junbing [1 ]
Cai, Xiaochen [1 ]
Huang, Shuo [1 ]
Tian, Sen [1 ]
Lei, Hongyan [2 ]
机构
[1] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Chengdu Univ TCM, Chengdu 611137, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Technology spillovers; Technological factors; Total factor productivity; Panel threshold model; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; DEVELOPMENT SPILLOVERS; ENERGY INTENSITY; GROWTH; TRADE; FDI; SPECIFICATION; INDUSTRIES; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2018.12.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigates the effects of technological factors, including indigenous research and development (R&D) investments, technology spillovers coming from foreign direct investments, export, and import, on China's total factor productivity (TFP). Using provincial panel data of China, covering 30 provinces over the period 2000-2014, our results confirm that indigenous R&D investments play a leading role in promoting TFP. Linear analysis suggests that, except for export, the technology spillovers through openness are beneficial for TFP growth. However, a further discussion based on a panel threshold model suggests that the different behaviours of these technology spillovers are dependent on the technological absorptive capacity affecting factors, such as human capital and indigenous R&D investments. The human capital will strengthen the spillover effects of each technology spillover. However, R&D intensity initially tends to hamper their spillover effects. Once the R&D intensity exceeds a certain level, the negative spillover effect of export on TFP tends to be alleviated, and the positive spillover effect of foreign direct investment and import on TFP will increase.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 285
页数:15
相关论文
共 68 条
[31]   Product differentiation, export participation and productivity growth: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms [J].
Hu, Cui ;
Tan, Yong .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 41 :234-252
[32]  
Huang J. B., 2017, ENERGY POLICY, V109
[33]   Investigating the driving forces of China's carbon intensity based on a dynamic spatial model [J].
Huang, Junbing .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (22) :21833-21843
[34]   Indigenous versus foreign innovation and energy intensity in China [J].
Huang, Junbing ;
Hao, Yu ;
Lei, Hongyan .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 81 :1721-1729
[35]   The driving forces of the change in China's energy intensity: An empirical research using DEA-Malmquist and spatial panel estimations [J].
Huang, Junbing ;
Du, Dan ;
Hao, Yu .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2017, 65 :41-50
[36]   Energy savings via FDI? Empirical evidence from developing countries [J].
Huebler, Michael ;
Keller, Andreas .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2010, 15 :59-80
[37]   Does it matter where you come from? Vertical spillovers from foreign direct investment and the origin of investors [J].
Javorcik, Beata S. ;
Spatareanu, Mariana .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2011, 96 (01) :126-138
[38]   Interjurisdiction political competition and green total factor productivity in China: An inverted-U relationship [J].
Jin, Gang ;
Shen, Kunrong ;
Li, Jian .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2020, 61
[39]   A retrospective look at the US productivity growth resurgence [J].
Jorgenson, Dale W. ;
Ho, Mun S. ;
Stiroh, Kevin J. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 22 (01) :3-24
[40]   Technology spillovers, absorptive capacity and economic growth [J].
Lai Mingyong ;
Peng Shuijun ;
Bao Qun .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 17 (03) :300-320