Technological factors and total factor productivity in China: Evidence based on a panel threshold model

被引:112
作者
Huang, Junbing [1 ]
Cai, Xiaochen [1 ]
Huang, Shuo [1 ]
Tian, Sen [1 ]
Lei, Hongyan [2 ]
机构
[1] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Chengdu Univ TCM, Chengdu 611137, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Technology spillovers; Technological factors; Total factor productivity; Panel threshold model; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; DEVELOPMENT SPILLOVERS; ENERGY INTENSITY; GROWTH; TRADE; FDI; SPECIFICATION; INDUSTRIES; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2018.12.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigates the effects of technological factors, including indigenous research and development (R&D) investments, technology spillovers coming from foreign direct investments, export, and import, on China's total factor productivity (TFP). Using provincial panel data of China, covering 30 provinces over the period 2000-2014, our results confirm that indigenous R&D investments play a leading role in promoting TFP. Linear analysis suggests that, except for export, the technology spillovers through openness are beneficial for TFP growth. However, a further discussion based on a panel threshold model suggests that the different behaviours of these technology spillovers are dependent on the technological absorptive capacity affecting factors, such as human capital and indigenous R&D investments. The human capital will strengthen the spillover effects of each technology spillover. However, R&D intensity initially tends to hamper their spillover effects. Once the R&D intensity exceeds a certain level, the negative spillover effect of export on TFP tends to be alleviated, and the positive spillover effect of foreign direct investment and import on TFP will increase.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 285
页数:15
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Are the FDI inflow spillover effects on Malaysia's economic growth input driven? [J].
Ahmed, Elsadig Musa .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2012, 29 (04) :1498-1504
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ECONOMETRIC ANAL
[4]   SOME TESTS OF SPECIFICATION FOR PANEL DATA - MONTE-CARLO EVIDENCE AND AN APPLICATION TO EMPLOYMENT EQUATIONS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOND, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (02) :277-297
[5]   Productivity Spillovers Across Countries and Industries: New Evidence From OECD Countries [J].
Badinger, Harald ;
Egger, Peter .
OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2016, 78 (04) :501-521
[6]   Cross-Country Differences in Productivity: The Role of Allocation and Selection [J].
Bartelsman, Eric ;
Haltiwanger, John ;
Scarpetta, Stefano .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) :305-334
[7]   Do R & D activities matter for productivity? A regional spatial approach assessing the role of human and social capital [J].
Bengoa, Marta ;
Martinez-San Roman, Valeriano ;
Perez, Patricio .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2017, 60 :448-461
[8]   Total factor productivity convergence in German states since reunification: Evidence and explanations [J].
Burda, Michael C. ;
Severgnini, Battista .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2018, 46 (01) :192-211
[9]  
蔡伟毅, 2010, [数量经济技术经济研究, Quantitative & Technical Economics], P57
[10]  
Cai XC, 2012, MANAGEMENT WORLD, V6, P8