MR pelvimetry: prognosis for successful vaginal delivery in patients with suspected fetopelvic disproportion or breech presentation at term

被引:23
作者
Franz, Marie [1 ]
von Bismarck, Amanda [1 ]
Delius, Maria [1 ]
Ertl-Wagner, Birgit [2 ]
Deppe, Charlotte [1 ]
Mahner, Sven [1 ]
Hasbargen, Uwe [1 ]
Huebener, Christoph [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst Clin Radiol, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
关键词
MR; Pelvimetry; Vaginal delivery; Breech; Fetopelvic disproportion; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE PELVIMETRY; FETAL-PELVIC INDEX; IMAGING PELVIMETRY; CEPHALOPELVIC DISPROPORTION; CESAREAN-DELIVERY; TRIAL; LABOR; RISK; MANAGEMENT; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-016-4276-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study was to correlate MR pelvimetric pelvic inlet measurements with mode of delivery and neonatal outcome in patients with suspected fetopelvic disproportion or breech presentation. Methods For this retrospective monocentric study, 237 consecutive MR pelvimetry reports ( 1999-2016) of pregnant women due to either suspected fetopelvic disproportion, pelvic deformation after trauma, or persistent breech presentation were retrieved from the radiologic database and matched with corresponding information from the obstetric database. Results Of 223 included women, 95 ( 42.6%) underwent planned cesarean section ( pCS) and 128 ( 57.4%) underwent a trial of vaginal labour ( TOL), of whom 93 ( 72.7%) delivered vaginally. Vaginal delivery was successful in 45 out of 64 ( 70.3%) cephalic cases and in 48 out of 64 ( 75.0%) breech cases. We found statistically significant differences in conjugata vera obstetrica ( CV) and diameter transversalis ( DT) between the groups TOL and pCS ( CV: 12.5 +/- 1.0 vs 12.1 +/- 1.2 cm, p value 0.001; DT: 13.3 +/- 0.9 vs 12.7 +/- 0.9 cm, p value <0.001, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between successful VD and cesarean section after TOL (CV: 12.5 +/- 0.9 vs 12.3 +/- 1.1 cm, p value 0.194; DT: 13.4 +/- 0.9 vs 13.2 +/- 0.9 cm, p value 0.358, respectively). Conclusions In our cohort, MR pelvimetry was a useful tool for prepartal assessment of the female pelvis in the selection of TOL candidates. Yet, it does not seem to yield additional predictive value for women with a previous vaginal delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 359
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
BAKER PN, 1994, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V170, P32
[2]   THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF BREECH DELIVERY [J].
BERGER, R ;
SAWODNY, E ;
BACHMANN, G ;
HERRMANN, S ;
KUNZEL, W .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1994, 55 (02) :97-103
[3]   The value of imaging pelvimetry in the management of the breech presentation at term [J].
Bisits, Andrew .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 55 (01) :99-100
[4]   Can fetal-pelvic disproportion be predicted [J].
Ferguson, JE ;
Sistrom, CL .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 43 (02) :247-264
[5]   The magnetic resonance imaging-based fetal-pelvic index: A pilot study in the community hospital [J].
Fox, LK ;
Huerta-Enochian, GS ;
Hamlin, JA ;
Katz, VL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (06) :1679-1685
[6]  
Griffiths M, 1998, LANCET, V351, P912, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)70332-9
[7]   Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial [J].
Hannah, ME ;
Hannah, WJ ;
Hewson, SA ;
Hodnett, ED ;
Saigal, S ;
Willan, AR .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9239) :1375-1383
[8]  
Harper LM, 2013, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V208
[9]   Vaginal breech deliveries selected using computed tomographic pelvimetry may be associated with fewer adverse outcomes [J].
Jeyabalan, A ;
Larkin, RW ;
Landers, DV .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2005, 17 (06) :381-385
[10]   Temperature elevation in the fetus from electromagnetic exposure during magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Kikuchi, Satoru ;
Saito, Kazuyuki ;
Takahashi, Masaharu ;
Ito, Koichi .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (08) :2411-2426