Convex relaxation of Sparse Tableau Formulation for the AC optimal power flow

被引:4
作者
Park, Byungkwon [1 ]
DeMarco, Christopher L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, 1415 Engn Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
Convex relaxation; Electricity market; McCormick envelope; Optimal power flow; Power system modeling; Sparse Tableau Formulation;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsr.2019.02.020
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Optimal power flow (OPF) approaches employing such methods as semi-definite programming (SDP) have garnered considerable interest in the literature of the last decade. The OPF formulations for these approaches have almost universally relied on Y-bus admittance matrix representations, which derive from nodal analysis, and restrict allowable network elements to be voltage-controlled only. Limitations of nodal analysis long been recognized, and to overcome these, commercial power system software often employs modified nodal analysis (MNA). Here, we consider a novel general power system modeling approach based on multi-port representation of individual components with Sparse Tableau Formulation (STF) of network constraints, which is more versatile than MNA for OPF requiring many monitored links with constrained flows. In STF, one is better able to exploit the fact that the vast majority of power grid network elements have voltage-current behavior that is well-modeled as linear. This opens the door to simple, engineering-based convex relaxations. We discuss two relaxations, admittance-based and current-based. The tightness of the relaxation is shown to improve when angle constraints and narrow bounds for active power generation are provided. Sequential bound tightening and reduced spatial branch-and-bound are discussed to obtain stronger relaxation solution. We conduct case studies to show the effectiveness of our relaxations with standard test cases.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 218
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], RTO UN COMM TEST SYS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, FEDERAL ENERGY REGUL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, GEN EL SIEM V R POM
[4]  
Belotti P., 2009, OPTIMIZATION METHODS
[5]  
Bergen A.R., 2000, Power System Analysis, V2nd
[6]   The QC Relaxation: A Theoretical and Computational Study on Optimal Power Flow [J].
Coffrin, Carleton ;
Hijazi, Hassan L. ;
Van Hentenryck, Pascal .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2016, 31 (04) :3008-3018
[7]  
Director S.W., 1979, CIRCUIT THEORY APPL, V7
[8]  
Dvijotham K., 2016, 2016 IEEE 55 C DEC C
[9]  
Frank S., 2012, ENERGY SYST, V3
[10]  
Frank S., 2013, ENERGY SYST, V3