European Green Deal Impact on Entrepreneurship and Competition: A Free Market Approach

被引:6
作者
Bogoslov, Ioana Andreea [1 ]
Lungu, Anca Elena [2 ]
Stoica, Eduard Alexandru [1 ]
Georgescu, Mircea Radu [2 ]
机构
[1] Lucian Blaga Univ Sibiu, Fac Econ Sci, Sibiu 550324, Romania
[2] Alexandru Ioan Cuza Univ, Fac Econ & Business Adm, Iasi 700506, Romania
关键词
European Green Deal; EGD; entrepreneurship; competition; critique; regulation; POLICY;
D O I
10.3390/su141912335
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Green Deal (EGD) represents a new and ambitious growth strategy proposed by the European Commission for transforming the EU into a prosperous and resilient society based on competitive economy, efficiency in terms of resource allocation and a green environment. Under these circumstances, the aim of the present research is to highlight the main criticisms of the European Green Deal by taking into consideration the competition and entrepreneurial dimensions of the common market. Methodologically, the research entails a systematic review of the specialty literature and, alongside this, a preliminary bibliometric study on the analysed topic. Therefore, several critical issues on the European Green Deal's impact on entrepreneurship and competition are highlighted. The research results illustrate that the European Green Deal affects entrepreneurial activity through a prioritization of the environmental dimension, despite the free market. Aiming to achieve the stated goals, the EGD provides the context of governmental interventions and regulations, which will distort entrepreneurship and competitional processes through fiscal policies and other instruments. The lack of clarity, the ambiguous objectives and the overall costs are also weaknesses of the European Green Deal, as highlighted by the present research. Even if it seems impressive on paper, many researchers demonstrated its inefficiency and impossibility. However, the research results are far away from denying the importance of the European Green Deal, considering the long-term perspective.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   ENTREPRENEURSHIP - PRODUCTIVE, UNPRODUCTIVE, AND DESTRUCTIVE [J].
BAUMOL, WJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1990, 98 (05) :893-921
[2]  
BAUMOL WJ, 1968, AM ECON REV, V58, P64
[3]   SME policy support in Britain since the 1990s: what have we learnt? [J].
Bennett, Robert .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2008, 26 (02) :375-397
[4]  
Bohm-Bawerk EugenV., 1930, The Positive Theory of Capital
[5]  
Bradford A., 2020, Foreign Affairs, DOI [10.1093/oso/ 9780190088583.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780190088583.003.0002, 10.1093/oso/9780190088583.001.0001, 10.1093/oso/9780190088583.003.0002]
[6]   Environmental Consequences of Closing the Textile Loop-Life Cycle Assessment of a Circular Polyester Jacket [J].
Braun, Gregor ;
Som, Claudia ;
Schmutz, Melanie ;
Hischier, Roland .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (07)
[7]  
Chraye H, 2020, EUR CONF POW ELECTR
[8]   Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action [J].
Dean, Thomas J. ;
McMullen, Jeffery S. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2007, 22 (01) :50-76
[9]   Entrepreneurship and failure: two sides of the same coin? [J].
Eklund, Johan ;
Levratto, Nadine ;
Ramello, Giovanni B. .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2020, 54 (02) :373-382
[10]  
EU, 2019, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 of 28 November 2019 establishing uniform conditions for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and the Council, as regards protective measures against pests of plants, and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 690/2008 and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019, P1, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004, DOI 10.2833/9937, 10.2833/9937]