OBSERVATION OF MAGNETIC RECONNECTION AT A 3D NULL POINT ASSOCIATED WITH A SOLAR ERUPTION

被引:10
作者
Sun, J. Q. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, J. [3 ]
Yang, K. [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, X. [1 ,2 ]
Ding, M. D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Astron & Space Sci, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Modern Astron & Astrophys, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] George Mason Univ, Dept Phys Astron & Computat Sci, 4400 Univ Dr,MSN 6A2, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Sun: corona; Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs); Sun: flares; Sun: magnetic fields; PARTICLE-ACCELERATION; CURRENT SHEET; FLARE; REGION; MODEL; SDO; EJECTIONS; EVOLUTION; CORONA;
D O I
10.3847/2041-8205/830/1/L4
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Magnetic null has long been recognized as a special structure serving as a preferential site for magnetic reconnection (MR). However, the direct observational study of MR at null-points is largely lacking. Here, we show the observations of MR around a magnetic null associated with an eruption that resulted in an M1.7 flare and a coronal mass ejection. The Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites X-ray profile of the flare exhibited two peaks at similar to 02:23 UT and similar to 02:40 UT on 2012 November 8, respectively. Based on the imaging observations, we find that the first and also primary X-ray peak was originated from MR in the current sheet (CS) underneath the erupting magnetic flux rope (MFR). On the other hand, the second and also weaker X-ray peak was caused by MR around a null point located above the pre-eruption MFR. The interaction of the null point and the erupting MFR can be described as a two-step process. During the first step, the erupting and fast expanding MFR passed through the null point, resulting in a significant displacement of the magnetic field surrounding the null. During the second step, the displaced magnetic field started to move back, resulting in a converging inflow and subsequently the MR around the null. The null-point reconnection is a different process from the current sheet reconnection in this flare; the latter is the cause of the main peak of the flare, while the former is the cause of the secondary peak of the flare and the conspicuous high-lying cusp structure.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   3D Solar Null Point Reconnection MHD Simulations [J].
Baumann, G. ;
Galsgaard, K. ;
Nordlund, A. .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 2013, 284 (02) :467-487
[2]   The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) Vector Magnetic Field Pipeline: SHARPs - Space-Weather HMI Active Region Patches [J].
Bobra, M. G. ;
Sun, X. ;
Hoeksema, J. T. ;
Turmon, M. ;
Liu, Y. ;
Hayashi, K. ;
Barnes, G. ;
Leka, K. D. .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 2014, 289 (09) :3549-3578
[3]   Particle acceleration by a solar flare termination shock [J].
Chen, Bin ;
Bastian, Timothy S. ;
Shen, Chengcai ;
Gary, Dale E. ;
Krucker, Saem ;
Glesener, Lindsay .
SCIENCE, 2015, 350 (6265) :1238-1242
[4]   Observation of a 3D magnetic null point in the solar corona [J].
Filippov, B .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 1999, 185 (02) :297-309
[5]   Evidence for the flare trigger site and three-dimensional reconnection in multiwavelength observations of a solar flare [J].
Fletcher, L ;
Metcalf, TR ;
Alexander, D ;
Brown, DS ;
Ryder, LA .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 554 (01) :451-463
[6]   Steady state reconnection at a single 3D magnetic null point [J].
Galsgaard, K. ;
Pontin, D. I. .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2011, 529
[7]   Differential emission measures from the regularized inversion of Hinode and SDO data [J].
Hannah, I. G. ;
Kontar, E. P. .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2012, 539
[8]   THEORETICAL MODEL OF FLARES AND PROMINENCES .1. EVAPORATING FLARE MODEL [J].
HIRAYAMA, T .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 1974, 34 (02) :323-338
[9]  
KOPP RA, 1976, SOL PHYS, V50, P85, DOI 10.1007/BF00206193
[10]   MEASUREMENTS OF THE CORONAL ACCELERATION REGION OF A SOLAR FLARE [J].
Krucker, Saem ;
Hudson, H. S. ;
Glesener, L. ;
White, S. M. ;
Masuda, S. ;
Wuelser, J. -P. ;
Lin, R. P. .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 714 (02) :1108-1119