International Energy Security Risk Index-Analysis of the Methodological Settings

被引:30
作者
Podbregar, Iztok [1 ]
Simic, Goran [2 ]
Radovanovic, Mirjana [3 ]
Filipovic, Sanja [4 ]
Sprajc, Polona [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maribor, Fac Org Sci, Dept Org & Management, Kranj 4000, Slovenia
[2] Univ Def Belgrade, Dept Simulat & Distance Learning, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
[3] Educons Univ, Fac Secur Studies, Dept Energy Secur, Sremska Kamenica 21208, Serbia
[4] Singidunum Univ, Fac Business, Dept Econ Theory & Anal, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
关键词
International Energy Security Risk Index; analysis; stepwise regression; principal component analysis; Promax oblique rotation;
D O I
10.3390/en13123234
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The main objective of this paper is to analyze model settings of the International Energy Security Risk Index developed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The study was performed using stepwise regression, principal component analysis, and Promax oblique rotation. The conclusion of the regression analysis shows that Crude Oil Price and Global Coal Reserves are sufficient to explain 90% of the variance of the Index. However, if a model that explains 100% of the variance of the Index is chosen and other variables are added, Global Coal Reserves loses importance due to the presence of other parameters in which it is contained. Regardless of the chosen model of analysis, it is evident that there is room for revising the Index and removing variables that do not contribute to its precision. The research showed that the main disadvantage of the variables that make up the Index rests with the fact that the variables are of different degrees of generality, that is, one parameter is contained in other parameters (unclear which other). The research covers data for 25 countries over a 26-year period, with the first year of the research being 1980 and the last 2016 (the latest available report).
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Energy security: Definitions, dimensions and indexes [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Choong, W. L. ;
Ng, T. S. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 42 :1077-1093
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ISS MON 2019 GLOB RE
[3]   Definitions and dimensions of energy security: a literature review [J].
Azzuni, Abdelrahman ;
Breyer, Christian .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 7 (01)
[4]   Forty years of energy security trends: A comparative assessment of 22 industrialized countries [J].
Brown, Marilyn A. ;
Wang, Yu ;
Sovacool, Benjamin K. ;
D'Agostino, Anthony Louis .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2014, 4 :64-77
[5]   The concept of energy security: Beyond the four As [J].
Cherp, Aleh ;
Jewell, Jessica .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 75 :415-421
[6]   A Review on Variable Selection in Regression Analysis [J].
Desboulets, Loann David Denis .
ECONOMETRICS, 2018, 6 (04)
[7]   Evaluation of PCA and ICA of simulated ERPs: Promax vs. infomax rotations [J].
Dien, Joseph ;
Khoe, Wayne ;
Mangun, George R. .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2007, 28 (08) :742-763
[8]  
Dyer H, 2013, ELGAR ORIG REF, P1, DOI 10.4337/9781781007907
[9]   An assessment of Indonesia's energy security index and comparison with seventy countries [J].
Erahman, Qodri Febrilian ;
Purwanto, Widodo Wahyu ;
Sudibandriyo, Mahmud ;
Hidayatno, Akhmad .
ENERGY, 2016, 111 :364-376
[10]   A Deep-Learning-Based Oil-Well-Testing Stage Interpretation Model Integrating Multi-Feature Extraction Methods [J].
Feng, Xin ;
Feng, Qiang ;
Li, Shaohui ;
Hou, Xingwei ;
Liu, Shugui .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (08)