Positive presentation management and intelligence and the personality differentiation by intelligence hypothesis in job applicants

被引:21
作者
De Fruyt, F
Aluja, A
García, LF
Rolland, JP
Jung, SC
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Dev Personal & Social Psychol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Lleida Univ, Lleida, Spain
[3] Univ Paris 10, F-92001 Nanterre, France
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00337.x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Both positive presentation management (PPM) and intelligence are considered as factors influencing the variability of personality self-descriptions. The relationship between PPM and intelligence and the personality differentiation by intelligence hypothesis were examined in a large sample (N=20,183) of job applicants administered the Standard Progressive Matrices and the NEO-PI-R. A composite of 10 NEO-PI-R items served as a PPM marker. Contrary to expectations, PPM and intelligence were not related. Only the variance in openness scores was slightly and linearly associated with IQ, and the variance for neuroticism and extraversion scores was somewhat higher in the IQ range beyond 115. However, congruence and Structural Equation Modelling analyses comparing personality structures for different IQ samples underscored the structural invariance of the NEO-PI-R. It is concluded that the NEO-PI-R keeps its structural properties for individuals across the IQ distribution in selection assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 112
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]   Personality and intelligence: Gender, the big five, self-estimated and psychometric intelligence [J].
Furnham, A ;
Moutafi, J ;
Chamorro-Premuzic, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2005, 13 (01) :11-24
[22]   Testing the differentiation of personality by intelligence hypothesis [J].
Harris, JA ;
Vernon, PA ;
Jang, KL .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2005, 38 (02) :277-286
[23]   Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective [J].
Hogan, J ;
Holland, B .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (01) :100-112
[24]  
HOGAN R, IN PRESS PSYCHOL FRA
[25]   Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].
Hu, Li-tze ;
Bentler, Peter M. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55
[26]  
Jensen AR., 1999, G FACTOR SCI MENTAL, V10, P5
[27]  
LIENERT GA, 1963, DIAGNOSTICA, V9, P3
[28]  
LYNN R, 1992, J GENET PSYCHOL, V153, P229
[29]   Socially desirable responding and the factorial stability of the NEO PI-R [J].
Marshall, MB ;
De Fruyt, F ;
Rolland, JP ;
Bagby, RM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2005, 17 (03) :379-384
[30]  
McCrae R., 2002, 5 FACTOR MODEL PERSO