How does GP training impact rural and remote underserved communities? Exploring community and professional perceptions

被引:3
作者
Kanakis, Katerina [1 ]
Young, Louise [1 ]
Reeve, Carole [1 ]
Hays, Richard [1 ]
Gupta, Tarun Sen [1 ]
Malau-Aduli, Bunmi [1 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, Townsville, Qld 4814, Australia
关键词
GP training; Underserved communities; Rural; Remote; Family medicine; Impact; Socio-economic; MEDICAL-STUDENTS; PERFORMANCE; WORKFORCE; EDUCATION; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-020-05684-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundSubstantial government funding has been invested to support the training of General Practitioners (GPs) in Australia to serve rural communities. However, there is little data on the impact of this expanded training on smaller communities, particularly for smaller rural and more remote communities. Improved understanding of the impact of training on underserved communities will assist in addressing this gap and inform ongoing investment by governments and communities.MethodA purposive sample of GP supervisors, GP registrars, practice managers and health services staff, and community members (n=40) from previously identified areas of workforce need in rural and remote North-West Queensland were recruited for this qualitative study. Participants had lived in their communities for periods ranging from a few months to 63years (Median=12years). Semi-structured interviews and a focus group were conducted to explore how establishing GP training placements impacts underserved communities from a health workforce, health outcomes, economic and social perspective. The data were then analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsParticipants reported they perceived GP training to improve communities' health services and health status (accessibility, continuity of care, GP workforce, health status, quality of health care and sustainable health care), some social factors (community connectedness and relationships), cultural factors (values and identity), financial factors (economy and employment) and education (rural pathway). Further, benefits to the registrars (breadth of training, community-specific knowledge, quality of training, and relationships with the community) were reported that also contributed to community development.ConclusionGP training and supervision is possible in smaller and more remote underserved communities and is perceived positively. Training GP registrars in smaller, more remote communities, matches their training more closely with the comprehensive primary care services needed by these communities.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, SURV HLTH CAR SEL FI
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, SUSTAINABILITY CHANG
  • [3] Australian College of Rural & Remote Medicine [ACRRM], 2020, PATHW FELL
  • [4] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare [AIHW], 2017, RUR REM HLTH 2017
  • [5] Students learning from patients: Let's get real in medical education
    Bleakley, Alan
    Bligh, John
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2008, 13 (01) : 89 - 107
  • [6] Boyatzis R., 1998, Transferring qualitative information", V1st, DOI DOI 10.1177/102831539700100211
  • [7] Braun V., 2006, Qual. Res. Psychol, V3, P77, DOI DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
  • [8] Campbell DG, 2011, MED J AUSTRALIA, V194, pS71
  • [9] Creswell J. W., 2018, Research Design Qualitative Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, V5th, DOI DOI 10.3109/08941939.2012.723954
  • [10] Cristobal F, 2012, RURAL REMOTE HEALTH, V12