Simple Dynamics for Plurality Consensus

被引:14
作者
Becchetti, Luca [1 ]
Clementi, Andrea [2 ]
Natale, Emanuele [1 ]
Pasquale, Francesco [1 ]
Silvestri, Riccardo [1 ]
Trevisan, Luca [3 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Roma, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Tor Vergata Roma, Rome, Italy
[3] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ACM SYMPOSIUM ON PARALLELISM IN ALGORITHMS AND ARCHITECTURES (SPAA'14) | 2014年
关键词
Plurality Consensus; Parallel Randomized Algorithms; Markov Chains;
D O I
10.1145/2612669.2612677
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We study a Plurality Consensus process in which each of n anonymous agents of a communication network supports an initial opinion (a color chosen from a finite set [k]) and, at every time step, he can revise his color according to a random sample of neighbors. The goal (of the agents) is to let the process converge to the stable configuration where all nodes support the plurality color. It is assumed that the initial color configuration has a sufficiently large bias s, that is, the number of nodes supporting the plurality color exceeds the number of nodes supporting any other color by an additive value s. We consider a basic model in which the network is a clique and the update rule (called here the 3-majority dynamics) of the process is that each agent looks at the colors of three random neighbors and then applies the majority rule (breaking ties uniformly at random). We prove a tight bound on the convergence time which grows as Theta(k log n) for a wide range of parameters k and n. This linear-in-k dependence implies an exponential time-gap between the plurality consensus process and the median process studied in [7]. A natural question is whether looking at more (than three) random neighbors can significantly speed up the process. We provide a negative answer to this question: in particular, we show that samples of polylogarithmic size can speed up the process by a polylogarithmic factor only.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 256
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Simple matrix methods for analyzing diffusion models of choice probability, choice response time, and simple response time [J].
Diederich, A ;
Busemeyer, JR .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 47 (03) :304-322
[22]   Convergence Time of Quantized Metropolis Consensus Over Time-Varying Networks [J].
Basar, Tamer ;
Etesami, Seyed Rasoul ;
Olshevsky, Alex .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2016, 61 (12) :4048-4054
[23]   Simple models of distributed co-ordination [J].
Kaplan, F .
CONNECTION SCIENCE, 2005, 17 (3-4) :249-270
[24]   THE CUTOFF PROFILE FOR THE SIMPLE EXCLUSION PROCESS ON THE CIRCLE [J].
Lacoin, Hubert .
ANNALS OF PROBABILITY, 2016, 44 (05) :3399-3430
[25]   Simple confidence intervals for MCMC without CLTs [J].
Rosenthal, Jeffrey S. .
ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2017, 11 (01) :211-214
[26]   Simple and clever decision rules for a model of evolution [J].
Sandholm, WH .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1998, 61 (02) :165-170
[27]   Simple formulae for counting processes in reliability models [J].
Ledoux, J ;
Rubino, G .
ADVANCES IN APPLIED PROBABILITY, 1997, 29 (04) :1018-1038
[28]   Diameters of Symmetric and Lifted Simple Exclusion Models [J].
Zhang, Xusheng ;
Krauth, Werner .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 191 (08)
[29]   Bayesian clustering by dynamics [J].
Ramoni, M ;
Sebastiani, P ;
Cohen, P .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2002, 47 (01) :91-121
[30]   Bayesian Clustering by Dynamics [J].
Marco Ramoni ;
Paola Sebastiani ;
Paul Cohen .
Machine Learning, 2002, 47 :91-121