EVALUATIONS OF INFINITE UTILITY STREAMS: PARETO EFFICIENT AND EGALITARIAN AXIOMATICS

被引:10
作者
Alcantud, Jose Carlos R. [1 ]
Garcia-Sanz, Maria D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salamanca, Fac Econ & Empresa, E-37007 Salamanca, Spain
关键词
WEAK PARETO; EQUITY; IMPOSSIBILITY;
D O I
10.1111/meca.12012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This investigation focuses on the aggregation of infinite utility streams by social welfare functions. We analyze the possibility of combining Pareto-efficiency and Hammond Equity principles when the feasible utilities for each generation are [0, 1] and the natural numbers. In the latter case, the Hammond Equity ethics can be combined with non-trivial specifications of the Pareto postulate, even through anonymous social welfare functions. As a consequence, any evaluation of infinite utility streams that verifies a mild specification of the Paretian axiom must exert some interference on the affairs of particular generations.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 447
页数:16
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Addler M., 2011, WELL BEING FAIR DIST
[2]   Liberal approaches to ranking infinite utility streams: when can we avoid interference? [J].
Alcantud, Jose Carlos R. .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2013, 41 (02) :381-396
[3]  
Alcantud J. C. R., 2013, EC THEORY B IN PRESS
[4]   Paretian evaluation of infinite utility streams: An egalitarian criterion [J].
Alcantud, Jose C. R. ;
Garcia-Sanz, Maria D. .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2010, 106 (03) :209-211
[5]   Inequality averse criteria for evaluating infinite utility streams: The impossibility of Weak Pareto [J].
Alcantud, Jose Carlos R. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2012, 147 (01) :353-363
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, From Kant to Hilbert-A source book in the foundations of mathematics
[7]  
Asheim G. B., 2004, 3204 NORW SCH EC BUS
[8]  
Asheim G. B., 2007, INTERGENERATIONAL EQ
[9]   Resolving distributional conflicts between generations [J].
Asheim, GB ;
Tungodden, B .
ECONOMIC THEORY, 2004, 24 (01) :221-230
[10]   Sustainable recursive social welfare functions [J].
Asheim, Geir B. ;
Mitra, Tapan ;
Tungodden, Bertil .
ECONOMIC THEORY, 2012, 49 (02) :267-292