A systems-based sustainability assessment framework to capture active impacts in product life cycle/manufacturing

被引:7
作者
Kumar, Manish [1 ]
Mani, Monto [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Sci, Ctr Prod Design & Mfg, Bangalore 560012, Karnataka, India
[2] Indian Inst Sci, Ctr Sustainable Technol, Bangalore 560012, Karnataka, India
来源
SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING FOR GLOBAL CIRCULAR ECONOMY | 2019年 / 33卷
关键词
Active Impacts; Sustainability assessment; Product life cycle; Manufacturing; ALUMINUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.promfg.2019.04.081
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Impacts associated with various product life-cycle phases can be characterized geographically and classified as embodied or active; embodied impacts are accounted for in the realization of a product, e.g., water used in manufacturing; active impacts occur during use and post-use phases, e.g., microfibers in the living tissues of aquatic life. Active impacts can often be more significant than embodied impacts. Embodied impacts are easy to quantify and regulate through efficiency-based measures; whereas active impacts are difficult to trace and quantify, requiring an effectiveness-based approach. Active impacts have greater bearing on sustainability and require systems-based approach to discern causality of impacts traceable to manufacturing/design. Further, current sustainability assessment (SA) tools inadequately trace geographically distributed nature of product life-cycle phases and associated impacts. This paper discusses a systems-based SA framework for manufacturing to capture and trace active impacts to the corresponding life-cycle phases, currently limited to acute and chronic impacts on societal health. The same methodology could be extended, subsequently, to accommodate economic and environmental impacts (of concern). (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 654
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Conceptual sustainable production principles in practice: Do they reflect what companies do? [J].
Alayon, C. ;
Safsten, K. ;
Johansson, G. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 141 :693-701
[2]   Microplastics in aquatic environments: Implications for Canadian ecosystems [J].
Anderson, Julie C. ;
Park, Bradley J. ;
Palace, Vince P. .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2016, 218 :269-280
[3]   Controversy over antibacterial silver: implications for environmental and sustainability assessments [J].
Boholm, Max ;
Arvidsson, Rickard .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 68 :135-143
[4]   Accumulation of Microplastic on Shorelines Woldwide: Sources and Sinks [J].
Browne, Mark Anthony ;
Crump, Phillip ;
Niven, Stewart J. ;
Teuten, Emma ;
Tonkin, Andrew ;
Galloway, Tamara ;
Thompson, Richard .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (21) :9175-9179
[5]   Product life cycle: the evolution of a paradigm and literature review from 1950-2009 [J].
Cao, Hui ;
Folan, Paul .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2012, 23 (08) :641-662
[6]  
Chandran K. M., 2016, Product Lifecycle Management for Digital Transformation of Industries: 13th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference, PLM 2016, Columbia, SC, USA, July 11-13, 2016, P606, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-54660-554, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-54660-554]
[7]   The emergence of sustainable manufacturing practices [J].
Despeisse, M. ;
Mbaye, F. ;
Ball, P. D. ;
Levers, A. .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2012, 23 (05) :354-376
[8]  
Duncan D., 2006, NATL GEOGR, P118
[9]  
Gasperi J, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SCI HL, V1, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.coesh.2017.10.002
[10]   Better - but is it good enough? On the need to consider both eco-efficiency and eco-effectiveness to gauge industrial sustainability [J].
Hauschild, Michael Z. .
22ND CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING, 2015, 29 :1-7