Engaging the unengaged voter: Vote centers and voter turnout

被引:59
作者
Stein, Robert M. [1 ]
Vonnahme, Greg [1 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Houston, TX 77251 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0022381608080456
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Previous election reforms designed to increase turnout have often made voting more convenient for frequent voters without significantly increasing turnout among infrequent voters. A recent innovation-Election Day vote centers-provides all alternative means of motivating electoral participation among infrequent voters. Election Day vote centers are nonprecinct-based locations for voting on Election Day. The sites are fewer in number than precinct-voting stations, centrally located to major population centers (rather than distributed among many residential locations), and rely on county-wide voter registration databases accessed by electronic voting machines. Voters in the voting jurisdiction (usually a county) are provided ballots appropriate to their voter registration address. It is thought that the use of voting centers on Election Day will increase voter turnout by reducing the cost and/or inconvenience associated with voting at traditional precinct locations. Since 2003 voters in Larimer County, CO have balloted at one of 32 vote centers. Precinct voting in Larimer ended in 2003. To test the efficacy of Election Day vote centers, we have collected individual vote histories on voters in Larimer and a control county (i.e., Weld, CO) that used precinct voting on Election Day for the years 1992-2004. We find significant evidence to support the hypothesis that Election Day vote centers increase voter turnout generally, and among infrequent voters in particular.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 497
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   The perverse consequences of electoral reform in the united states [J].
Berinsky, AJ .
AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 2005, 33 (04) :471-491
[2]   Who votes by mail? A dynamic model of the individual-level consequences of voting-by-mail systems [J].
Berinsky, AJ ;
Burns, N ;
Traugott, MW .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2001, 65 (02) :178-197
[3]  
BRADY H, 2002, 2004 ANN M SOC POL M
[4]   Causal effects in, nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs [J].
Dehejia, RH ;
Wahba, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (448) :1053-1062
[5]   AN ECONOMIC-THEORY OF POLITICAL-ACTION IN A DEMOCRACY [J].
DOWNS, A .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1957, 65 (02) :135-150
[6]   Distance, turnout, and the convenience of voting [J].
Dyck, JJ ;
Gimpel, JG .
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2005, 86 (03) :531-548
[7]   Political participation and the accessibility of the ballot box [J].
Gimpel, JG ;
Schuknecht, JE .
POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2003, 22 (05) :471-488
[8]  
Haspel M, 2005, J POLIT, V67, P560, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00329.x
[9]  
Hill J.L., 2004, APPL BAYESIAN MODELI
[10]  
HO D, 2005, MATCHING NONPA UNPUB