Being hypocritical disturbs some people more than others: How individual differences in preference for consistency moderate the behavioral effects of the induced-hypocrisy paradigm

被引:17
作者
Senemeaud, Cecile [1 ]
Mange, Jessica [1 ]
Fointiat, Valerie [2 ]
Somat, Alain [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Caen, NIMEC EA 969, Normandy Univ, F-14032 Caen, France
[2] Univ Lorraine, INTERPSY ETIC EA 4432, Metz, France
[3] Univ Rennes 2, CRPCC LAUREPS EA 1285, F-35043 Rennes, France
关键词
Preference for consistency; Individual differences; Behavioral change; Induced-hypocrisy paradigm; Cognitive dissonance; ACTION-BASED MODEL; COGNITIVE-DISSONANCE; SELF-CONCEPT; ATTITUDE-CHANGE; MOTIVATION; INCONSISTENCY; INDUCTION; THINKING; CULTURE; ESTEEM;
D O I
10.1080/15534510.2013.791235
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article examines whether individual differences in preference for consistency (PFC) affect the behavioral change in the induced-hypocrisy paradigm. Undergraduate students (N=108) completed the PFC scale either 1month (no PFC-focus condition) or immediately before (PFC-focus condition) the induced-hypocrisy procedure; this procedure includes pro-social advocacy, transgression recall, and a behavioral change measure. Results demonstrated (1) that PFC-level predicts behavioral change only when the participants were focused on their own PFC and (2) a relationship between the number of recalled transgressions and behavioral change only for high-PFC participants in PFC-focus condition. The necessity of considering simultaneously PFC-level, PFC-focus, and the number of recalled transgressions to better predict behavioral change in the hypocrisy-paradigm, is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 148
页数:16
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Abelson R.P., 1968, THEORIES COGNITIVE C, P648
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Culture and social behavior
[3]   Dissonance, hypocrisy, and the self-concept [J].
Aronson, E .
COGNITIVE DISSONANCE: PROGRESS ON A PIVOTAL THEORY IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, :103-126
[4]   OVERCOMING DENIAL AND INCREASING THE INTENTION TO USE CONDOMS THROUGH THE INDUCTION OF HYPOCRISY [J].
ARONSON, E ;
FRIED, C ;
STONE, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1991, 81 (12) :1636-1638
[5]  
Aronson E., 1992, Psychological Inquiry, V3, P303, DOI [10.1207/s15327965pli03041, DOI 10.1207/S15327965PLI0304_1]
[6]  
Aronson E., 1968, THEORIES COGNITIVE C, P5
[7]   Cognitive motivation and religious orientation [J].
Barrett, DW ;
Patock-Peckham, JA ;
Hutchinson, GT ;
Nagoshi, CT .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2005, 38 (02) :461-474
[8]  
Bator R.J., 2006, SOC INFLUENCE, V1, P208, DOI DOI 10.1080/15534510600823638
[9]   Evidence of a positive relationship between age and preference for consistency [J].
Brown, SL ;
Asher, T ;
Cialdini, RB .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2005, 39 (05) :517-533
[10]  
Channouf A., 1997, Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, V36, P28