Obstetric anal sphincter injury rates among primiparous women with different modes of vaginal delivery

被引:31
作者
Ampt, Amanda J. [1 ]
Patterson, Jillian A. [1 ]
Roberts, Christine L. [1 ]
Ford, Jane B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Clin & Populat Perinatal Hlth Res, Northern Clin Sch, Koiling Inst, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Forceps; International Classification of Diseases; Obstetric anal sphincter injury; Record linkage study; Vacuum; RISK-FACTORS; TRENDS; BIRTHS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.025
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether rates of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are continuing to increase and whether risk of OASIS according to mode of delivery is constant over time. Methods: In a retrospective population-based study, data were obtained for vaginal singleton vertex deliveries at 37-41 weeks of pregnancy among primiparous women in New South Wales, Australia, between January 2001 and December 2011. Annual OASIS rates were determined among non-instrumental, forceps, and vacuum deliveries with and without episiotomy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine adjusted odds ratios for each delivery mode category by year. Trends in adjusted odds ratios over time for each delivery category were compared. Results: OASIS occurred in 955 (4.1%) of 23 081 deliveries in 2001 and 1487 (5.9%) of 25 081 deliveries in 2011. After adjustment for known risk factors, the only delivery categories to show statistically significant increases in OASIS over the study period were non-instrumental deliveries without episiotomy (linear trend P < 0.001) and forceps deliveries with episiotomy (linear trend P = 0.004). Conclusion: Overall, OASIS rates have continued to increase. Known risk factors do not fully explain the increase in OASIS rates in non-instrumental deliveries without an episiotomy and in forceps deliveries with an episiotomy. Crown Copyright (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 264
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma [J].
Aasheim, Vigdis ;
Nilsen, Anne Britt Vika ;
Lukasse, Mirjam ;
Reinar, Liv Merete .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2011, (12)
[2]   Statistics Notes - Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates [J].
Altman, DG ;
Bland, JM .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7382) :219-219
[3]  
Ampt AJ, 2015, J PAEDIAT CHILD H S1, V51, P115
[4]  
Ampt Amanda J, 2013, N S W Public Health Bull, V24, P65, DOI 10.1071/NB12116
[5]   Trends in obstetric anal sphincter injuries and associated risk factors for vaginal singleton term births in New South Wales 20012009 [J].
Ampt, Amanda J. ;
Ford, Jane B. ;
Roberts, Christine L. ;
Morris, Jonathan M. .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 53 (01) :9-16
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, EV BAS GUID MIDW LED
[7]   Trends in Risk Factors for Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries in Norway [J].
Baghestan, Elham ;
Irgens, Lorentz M. ;
Bordahl, Per E. ;
Rasmussen, Svein .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (01) :25-33
[8]   Waterbirth and pelvic floor injury: a retrospective study and postal survey using ICIQ modular long form questionnaires [J].
Cortes, Eduardo ;
Basra, Ramandeep ;
Kelleher, Con J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2011, 155 (01) :27-30
[9]   Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors [J].
Gurol-Urganci, I. ;
Cromwell, D. A. ;
Edozien, L. C. ;
Mahmood, T. A. ;
Adams, E. J. ;
Richmond, D. H. ;
Templeton, A. ;
van der Meulen, J. H. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 (12) :1516-1525
[10]   Prevalence of anal sphincter injury in primiparous women [J].
Guzman Rojas, R. A. ;
Shek, K. L. ;
Langer, S. M. ;
Dietz, H. P. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 42 (04) :461-466