Characterization of solid breast masses -: Use of the sonographic breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon

被引:115
作者
Costantini, Melania
Belli, Paolo
Lombardi, Roberta
Franceschini, Gianluca
Mule, Antonino
Bonomo, Lorenzo
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Bioimaging & Radiol Sci, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Surg, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Pathol, I-00168 Rome, Italy
关键词
breast masses; diagnosis; sonography;
D O I
10.7863/jum.2006.25.5.649
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of sonographic American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS) classification in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses. Methods. One hundred seventy-eight breast masses studied by sonography with a known diagnosis were reviewed. All lesions were classified according to the sonographic BI-RADS lexicon. Pathologic results were compared with sonographic features. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the sonographic BI-RADS lexicon were calculated. Results. Twenty-six cases were assigned to class 3, 73 to class 4, and 79 to class 5. Pathologic results revealed 105 malignant and 73 benign lesions. The sonographic BI-RADS lexicon showed 71.3% accuracy, 98.1% sensitivity, 32.9% specificity, 67.8% PPV, and 92.3% NPV. The NPV for class 3 was 92.3%. The PPVs for classes 4 and 5 were 46.6% and 87.3%. Typical signs of malignancy were irregular shape, antiparallel orientation, noncircumscribed margin, echogenic halo, and decreased sound transmission. Typical signs of benignity were oval shape and circumscribed margin. Conclusions. The sonographic BI-RADS lexicon is an important system for describing and classifying breast lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 659
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2003, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
  • [2] Breast US: Assessment of technical quality and image interpretation
    Baker, JA
    Soo, MS
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (01) : 229 - 238
  • [3] Artifacts and pitfalls in sonographic imaging of the breast
    Baker, JA
    Soo, MS
    Rosen, EL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (05) : 1261 - 1266
  • [4] Ultrasound is now better than mammography for the detection of invasive breast cancer
    Benson, SRC
    Blue, J
    Judd, K
    Harman, JE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (04) : 381 - 385
  • [5] Analysis of sonographic features for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors of different sizes
    Chen, SC
    Cheung, YC
    Su, CH
    Chen, MF
    Hwang, TL
    Hsueh, S
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 23 (02) : 188 - 193
  • [6] The additional diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast cancer
    Flobbe, K
    Bosch, AM
    Kessels, AGH
    Beets, GL
    Nelemans, P
    von Meyenfeldt, MF
    van Engelshoven, JMA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (10) : 1194 - 1199
  • [7] Solid breast masses diagnosed as fibroadenoma at fine-needle aspiration biopsy: Acceptable rates of growth at long-term follow-up
    Gordon, PB
    Gagnon, FA
    Lanzkowsky, L
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (01) : 233 - 238
  • [8] Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: Can biopsy be averted?
    Graf, O
    Helbich, TH
    Fuchsjaeger, MH
    Hopf, G
    Morgun, M
    Graf, C
    Mallek, R
    Sickles, EA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (03) : 850 - 856
  • [9] BI-RADS for sonography: Positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features
    Hong, AS
    Rosen, EL
    Soo, MS
    Baker, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (04) : 1260 - 1265
  • [10] Sonography of the breast
    Jackson, VP
    Reynolds, HE
    Hawes, DR
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 1996, 17 (05) : 460 - 475