The impact of technology identification policy on firm innovation: Evidence from China

被引:11
作者
Fang, Hongsheng [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Xiao [1 ]
Shen, Jim Huangnan [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Zhao, Lexin [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Inst Fiscal Big Data & Policy, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Sch Management, Dept Appl Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Harvard Univ, Ctr Int Dev, Harvard Kennedy Sch, Growth Lab, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Univ Navarra, Core China Res Ctr, Sch Econ & Business, Pamplona, Spain
关键词
High-tech firms; Innovation; Financial incentives; Tax incentives; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; LEVEL EVIDENCE; TAX; INVESTMENT; SUBSIDIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101866
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using firm-level data of companies listed on China's A-share market from 2006 to 2017, this research applies a difference-in-differences (DID) empirical method to test whether the state policy in China used for identifying firms as being "high-tech" enhances their innovative capabilities. This paper presents three main findings. First, multiple robustness tests confirm that the state technology identification policy does improve the total number of patent applications as well as the number of patent invention applications. Second, government subsidy is an important channel through which this policy affects a firm's innovation capabilities. Third, this policy has a more prominent and positive influence on the innovation capabilities of firms located in regions where there exist a higher rate of taxation in addition and relatively more developed products and factor markets. Fourth, we conduct a flexible back-of-the-envelope cost-benefit analysis to demonstrate that the high-tech firm identification policy does improve the overall level of social welfare. The empirical results of this paper have far-reaching implications for China's innovation policies.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Institutional causes, macroeconomic symptoms: volatility, crises and growth [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Johnson, S ;
Robinson, J ;
Thaicharoen, Y .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2003, 50 (01) :49-123
[2]   Fiscal stress and the formation of zombie firms: Evidence from China [J].
Cai, Guowei ;
Zhang, Xuejiao ;
Yang, Hao .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2022, 71
[3]   Location-based tax incentives: Evidence from India [J].
Chaurey, Ritam .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2017, 156 :101-120
[4]  
Chen H., 2018, J. Manag. World, V34, P149, DOI [10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2018.0040, DOI 10.19744/J.CNKI.11-1235/F.2018.0040, 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2018.0040.html, DOI 10.19744/J.CNKI.11-1235/F.2018.0040.HTML]
[5]   A cost-benefit analysis of R&D and patents: Firm-level evidence from China [J].
Chen, Zhiyuan ;
Zhang, Jie ;
Zi, Yuan .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 133
[6]   The relationship between firm investment and financial status [J].
Cleary, S .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1999, 54 (02) :673-692
[7]   Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy [J].
Czarnitzki, D ;
Licht, G .
ECONOMICS OF TRANSITION, 2006, 14 (01) :101-131
[8]   Economic policy uncertainty, tax quotas and corporate tax burden: Evidence from China [J].
Dang, Dandan ;
Fang, Hongsheng ;
He, Minyuan .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 56
[9]   Tax Compliance and Investment Incentives: Firm Responses to Accelerated Depreciation in China [J].
Fan, Ziying ;
Liu, Yu .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2020, 176 :1-17
[10]  
Fang H.S., 2013, Economic Research Journal, V03, P108