Procyclical government spending: a public choice analysis

被引:19
作者
Abbott, Andrew [1 ]
Jones, Philip [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Sch Business, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
[2] Univ Bath, Dept Econ, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
关键词
Business cycles; Fiscal policy; Voracity effects; Volatility; FISCAL-POLICY;
D O I
10.1007/s11127-011-9816-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Procyclical government spending occurs when government expenditures increase at a faster rate than income in an economic upturn but fall at a faster rate in a recession. Voracity effects occur when competition for increased spending proves more effective as national income increases. Public choice theory can be applied to describe the distribution of fiscal power across different tiers of government to shed insight into competition for intergovernmental transfers. Politicians have electoral incentives to press for intergovernmental transfers but they also have electoral incentives to signal their ability to manage the economy. With this mix of incentives, the prediction is that intergovernmental transfers will be procyclical and that sub-central government spending will be more procyclical than central government spending. Public choice analysis of pressure for increased public spending predicts a specific pattern of cyclical government spending. This pattern can be observed when analyzing government expenditures in 20 OECD countries between 1995 and 2006.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 258
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Procyclical government spending: Patterns of pressure and prudence in the OECD [J].
Abbott, Andrew ;
Jones, Philip .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2011, 111 (03) :230-232
[2]  
Akitoby B., 2006, EUR J POLIT ECON, V22, P908, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.EJPOLECO.2005.12.001
[3]   Why is fiscal policy often procyclical? [J].
Alesina, Alberto ;
Campante, Filipe R. ;
Tabellini, Guido .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2008, 6 (05) :1006-1036
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, MANAGING FISCA UNPUB
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, PUBLIC CHOICE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1972, Theory of public choice
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Journal of Economic Growth, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00138863
[8]  
Arena M., 2009, WORLD BANK POLICY RE
[9]  
Arreaza A, 1998, NBER WORKING PAPERS, V6372
[10]   The flypaper effect: Identifying areas for further research [J].
Bailey, SJ ;
Connolly, S .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 1998, 95 (3-4) :335-361