WHICH PATIENTS WITH LOW BACK PAIN BENEFIT FROM DEADLIFT TRAINING?

被引:26
作者
Berglund, Lars [1 ,2 ]
Aasa, Bjorn [2 ]
Hellqvist, Jonas [1 ]
Michaelson, Peter [3 ]
Aasa, Ulrika [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Community Med & Rehabil, Physiotherapy, Umea, Sweden
[2] Umea Univ, Dept Surg & Perioperat Sci, Orthopaed, Umea, Sweden
[3] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Hlth Sci, Div Hlth & Rehabil, S-95187 Lulea, Sweden
关键词
motor control; resistance training; Biering-SOrensen test; pain intensity; prediction; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; MOTOR CONTROL EXERCISES; MOVEMENT CONTROL TESTS; CONDITIONING PRACTICES; LUMBAR SPINE; RELIABILITY; ENDURANCE; THERAPY; STRENGTH; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1519/JSC.0000000000000837
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Berglund, L, Aasa, B, Hellqvist, J, Michaelson, P, and Aasa, U. Which patients with low back pain benefit from deadlift training? J Strength Cond Res 29(7): 1803-1811, 2015Recent studies have indicated that the deadlift exercise may be effective in decreasing pain intensity and increasing activity for most, but not all, patients with a dominating pattern of mechanical low back pain. This study aimed to evaluate which individual factors measured at baseline could predict activity, disability, and pain intensity in patients with mechanical low back pain after an 8-week training period involving the deadlift as a rehabilitative exercise. Thirty-five participants performed deadlift training under the supervision of a physical therapist with powerlifting experience. Measures of pain-related fear of movement, hip and trunk muscle endurance, and lumbopelvic movement control were collected at baseline. Measures of activity, disability, and pain intensity were collected at baseline and at follow-up. Linear regression analyses were used to create models to predict activity, disability, and pain intensity at follow-up. Results showed that participants with less disability, less pain intensity, and higher performance on the Biering-SOrensen test, which tests the endurance of hip and back extensor muscles, at baseline benefit from deadlift training. The Biering-SOrensen test was the most robust predictor because it was included in all predictive models. Pain intensity was the next best predictor as it was included in 2 predictive models. Thus, for strength and conditioning professionals who use the deadlift as a rehabilitative exercise for individuals with mechanical low back pain, it is important to ensure that clients have sufficient back extensor strength and endurance and a sufficiently low pain intensity level to benefit from training involving the deadlift exercise.
引用
收藏
页码:1803 / 1811
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Individualized Low-Load Motor Control Exercises and Education Versus a High-Load Lifting Exercise and Education to Improve Activity, Pain Intensity, and Physical Performance in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Aasa, Bjorn
    Berglund, Lars
    Michaelson, Peter
    Aasa, Ulrika
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2015, 45 (02) : 77 - 85
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics
  • [3] The STarT Back Screening Tool and Individual Psychological Measures: Evaluation of Prognostic Capabilities for Low Back Pain Clinical Outcomes in Outpatient Physical Therapy Settings
    Beneciuk, Jason M.
    Bishop, Mark D.
    Fritz, Julie M.
    Robinson, Michael E.
    Asal, Nabih R.
    Nisenzon, Anne N.
    George, Steven Z.
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2013, 93 (03): : 321 - 333
  • [4] Which Prognostic Factors for Low Back Pain Are Generic Predictors of Outcome Across a Range of Recovery Domains?
    Cook, Chad E.
    Learman, Kenneth E.
    O'Halloran, Bryan J.
    Showalter, Christopher R.
    Kabbaz, Vincent J.
    Goode, Adam P.
    Wright, Alexis A.
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2013, 93 (01): : 32 - 40
  • [5] Motor Control Exercise for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Costa, Leonardo O. P.
    Maher, Christopher G.
    Latimer, Jane
    Hodges, Paul W.
    Herbert, Robert D.
    Refshauge, Kathryn M.
    McAuley, James H.
    Jennings, Matthew D.
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2009, 89 (12): : 1275 - 1286
  • [6] STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING PRACTICES OF UNITED STATES HIGH SCHOOL STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING COACHES
    Duehring, Michael D.
    Feldmann, Christina R.
    Ebben, William P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2009, 23 (08) : 2188 - 2203
  • [7] Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
    Dworkin, RH
    Turk, DC
    Farrar, JT
    Haythornthwaite, JA
    Jensen, MP
    Katz, NP
    Kerns, RD
    Stucki, G
    Allen, RR
    Bellamy, N
    Carr, DB
    Chandler, J
    Cowan, P
    Dionne, R
    Galer, BS
    Hertz, S
    Jadad, AR
    Kramer, LD
    Manning, DC
    Martin, S
    McCormick, CG
    McDermott, MP
    McGrath, P
    Quessy, S
    Rappaport, BA
    Robbins, W
    Robinson, JP
    Rothman, M
    Royal, MA
    Simon, L
    Stauffer, JW
    Stein, W
    Tollett, J
    Wernicke, J
    Witter, J
    [J]. PAIN, 2005, 113 (1-2) : 9 - 19
  • [8] Strength and conditioning practices of National Hockey League strength and conditioning coaches
    Ebben, WP
    Carroll, RM
    Simenz, CJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2004, 18 (04) : 889 - 897
  • [9] An electromyographic analysis of sumo and conventional style deadlifts
    Escamilla, RF
    Francisco, AC
    Kayes, AV
    Speer, KP
    Moorman, CT
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2002, 34 (04) : 682 - 688
  • [10] Comparison of general exercise, motor control exercise and spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low back pain: A randomized trial
    Ferreira, Manuela L.
    Ferreira, Paulo H.
    Latimer, Jane
    Herbert, Robert D.
    Hodges, Paul W.
    Jennings, Matthew D.
    Maher, Christopher G.
    Refshauge, Kathryn M.
    [J]. PAIN, 2007, 131 (1-2) : 31 - 37