A Parenteral Nutrition Use Survey With Gap Analysis

被引:54
作者
Boullata, Joseph I. [1 ,2 ]
Guenter, Peggi [3 ]
Mirtallo, Jay M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Hosp Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] ASPEN, Havertown, PA USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
parenteral nutrition; outcomes research/quality; public policy; PHYSICIAN ORDER ENTRY; SAFE PRACTICES; ENTERAL-NUTRITION; MEDICATION ERRORS; PRODUCT SHORTAGES; AMERICAN-SOCIETY; STANDARDS; ASPEN; PREVENTION; SPECIALTY;
D O I
10.1177/0148607112464781
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: Parenteral nutrition (PN) is a high-alert medication for which safe practice guidelines are available. Recent adverse events associated with PN have been widely reported. A survey of current practices was indicated as new guidelines are being considered. Methods: A web-based survey consisting of 70 items was made available for the month of August 2011. Respondents provided answers to questions that addressed all aspects of the PN use process. Results: There were a total of 895 respondents to the survey, including dietitians, nurses, pharmacists, and physicians. They predominantly represented hospital settings (89%), with 44% from academic institutions. Most organizations use a once-daily PN admixture with 21% outsourcing preparation. Electronic PN order entry is available in one-third of organizations, and the use of standardized order sets prevails. Unfortunately, electronic interfaces between computer systems remain infrequent, meaning that at least one transcription step is required by most in the PN use process. There are a wide variety of methods for ordering PN components, many of which are inconsistent with safe practices. Most organizations dedicate a pharmacist to review the PN orders, many of which require clarifications. Documentation at each step of the PN use process with oversight to identify deviations from best practice recommendations is infrequent. A significant proportion (44%) does not track PN-related medication errors. Conclusions: The survey data are a valuable snapshot of current practices with PN. Poor compliance with some of the safe practice guidelines continues. This will help guide new safety initiatives for the PN use process. (JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2013;37:212-222)
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 222
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2011, ASPEN RESP PAT DEATH
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, AM J HEALTH-SYST PH, V57, P1150
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, ISMPS LIST HIGH AL M
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, US PHARM NAT FORM
[5]   Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors [J].
Bates, DW ;
Leape, LL ;
Cullen, DJ ;
Laird, N ;
Petersen, LA ;
Teich, JM ;
Burdick, E ;
Hickey, M ;
Kleefield, S ;
Shea, B ;
Vander Vliet, M ;
Seger, DL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (15) :1311-1316
[6]  
Bing CM, 2009, EXTENDED STABILITY P
[7]   Improving the Safety and Effectiveness of Parenteral Nutrition: Results of a Quality Improvement Collaboration [J].
Boitano, Megan ;
Bojak, Shiva ;
McCloskey, Shirley ;
McCaul, David S. ;
McDonough, Megan .
NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 25 (06) :663-671
[8]   Overview of the Parenteral Nutrition Use Process [J].
Boullata, Joseph I. .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2012, 36 :10S-13S
[9]   Dosing and Monitoring of Trace Elements in Long-Term Home Parenteral Nutrition Patients [J].
Btaiche, Imad F. ;
Carver, Peggy L. ;
Welch, Kathleen B. .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2011, 35 (06) :736-747
[10]   Parenteral Nutrition Training for the Pharmacy Team: Focus on Pharmacy Technicians [J].
Cassano, Angela Turner .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2012, 36 :48S-50S