Muscle relaxant effects on insertion efficacy of the laryngeal mask ProSealA® in anesthetized patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial

被引:40
|
作者
Fujiwara, Atsushi [1 ]
Komasawa, Nobuyasu [1 ]
Nishihara, Isao [2 ]
Miyazaki, Shinichiro [1 ]
Tatsumi, Shinichi [1 ]
Nishimura, Wataru [1 ]
Minami, Toshiaki [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Takatsuki, Osaka 5698686, Japan
[2] Hokusetsu Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
关键词
LMA-ProSeal (R); Muscle relaxant; Sealing pressure; Insertion efficacy; BOUGIE-GUIDED INSERTION; CHEST COMPRESSION; AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; SIZE SELECTION; ADULT PATIENTS; VENTILATION; CROSSOVER; SURGERY; NECK;
D O I
10.1007/s00540-015-1982-3
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Anesthesiologists often encounter LMA-ProSeal(A (R)) (ProSeal) insertion difficulty due to its large cuff size. We performed a randomized clinical trial to examine how insertion efficacy and sealing pressure of ProSeal are affected by muscle relaxant administration in anesthetized patients. Our adult patients were either administered rocuronium (0.9 mg kg(-1)) as a muscle relaxant (R group; 40 patients) or not (C group; 40 patients). Anesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl. We compared the two groups with regard to the number of attempts required for successful insertion, sealing pressure, and subjective difficulty for insertion. Total insertion attempts required for successful ventilation in the two groups were one (R group, 38 patients; C group, 28 patients), two (R group, one patient; C group, seven patients), and three (R group, one patient; C group, five patients), revealing a significant difference between groups (p < 0.001). Sealing pressure was significantly higher in the R group than in the C group (R group, 27.4 +/- A 5.4 cmH(2)O; C group, 21.2 +/- A 5.2 cmH(2)O; p < 0.001). Leakage volume by mechanical ventilation was significantly smaller in the R group than in the C group (R group, 17.4 +/- A 29.1 ml; C group, 46.8 +/- A 45.5 ml; p < 0.001). Subjective difficulty of insertion was significantly lower in the R group than in the C group (R group, 12.3 +/- A 23.1 mm; C group, 39.4 +/- A 31.9 mm; p < 0.001). Muscle relaxation appears to facilitate ProSeal insertion efficacy by enabling higher successful insertion rates, higher sealing pressure, lower leakage volume, and lower subjective difficulty of insertion in anesthetized patients.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 584
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Muscle relaxant effects on insertion efficacy of the laryngeal mask ProSeal® in anesthetized patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Atsushi Fujiwara
    Nobuyasu Komasawa
    Isao Nishihara
    Shinichiro Miyazaki
    Shinichi Tatsumi
    Wataru Nishimura
    Toshiaki Minami
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2015, 29 : 580 - 584
  • [2] Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion with and without muscle relaxant in pediatric anesthesia; a randomized clinical trial
    Totonchi, Ziae
    Siamdoust, Seyed Alireza Seyed
    Zaman, Behrooz
    Rokhtabnak, Faranak
    Alavi, Seyyed Amin
    HELIYON, 2022, 8 (11)
  • [3] Muscle relaxant facilitates i-gel insertion by novice doctors: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Hattori, Kazuo
    Komasawa, Nobuyasu
    Miyazaki, Yu
    Kido, Haruki
    Deguchi, Shiho
    Minami, Toshiaki
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2016, 33 : 218 - 222
  • [4] Comparison of the clinical performance of the flexible laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients under general anesthesia with or without a muscle relaxant: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Byun, Sung Hye
    Kim, Soo Jin
    Kim, Eugene
    TRIALS, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [5] Head elevation and laryngeal mask airway Supreme insertion: A randomized controlled trial
    Park, Jun-Young
    Yu, Jihion
    Hong, Jun Hyuk
    Hwang, Jai-Hyun
    Kim, Young-Kug
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 65 (03) : 343 - 350
  • [6] Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial
    Seet, Edwin
    Rajeev, Subramanyam
    Firoz, Tamal
    Yousaf, Farhanah
    Wong, Jean
    Wong, David T.
    Chung, Frances
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (07) : 602 - 607
  • [7] Comparison of the size 3 and size 4 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, non-paralyzed women: a randomized controlled trial
    Kim, Mi-Hyun
    Hwang, Jung-Won
    Kim, Eun-Sung
    Han, Sung-Hee
    Jeon, Young-Tae
    Lee, Sun-Mi
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2015, 29 (02) : 256 - 262
  • [8] Comparison of the clinical performance of the flexible laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients under general anesthesia with or without a muscle relaxant: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Sung Hye Byun
    Soo Jin Kim
    Eugene Kim
    Trials, 20
  • [9] A randomized controlled trial comparing the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing anesthetized adults
    Greenberg, RS
    Brimacombe, J
    Berry, A
    Gouze, V
    Piantadosi, S
    Dake, EM
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 88 (04) : 970 - 977
  • [10] Teaching airway management with laryngeal mask: randomized controlled trial
    Pedersoli, Cesar Eduardo
    Martins Pedersoli, Tatiane Aparecida
    Mancussi e Faro, Ana Cristina
    Barcellos Dalri, Maria Celia
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2016, 69 (02) : 345 - 351