Overview of an interlaboratory collaboration on evaluating the effects of model hepatotoxicants on hepatic gene expression

被引:46
作者
Ulrich, RG
Rockett, JC
Gibson, GG
Pettit, SD
机构
[1] ILSI HESI, Washington, DC 20005 USA
[2] Rosetta Inpharmat, Merck Res Labs, Kirkland, WA USA
[3] US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Natl Hlth & Environm Effects Res Lab, Reprod Toxicol Div, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[4] Univ Surrey, Sch Biol & Mol Sci, Mol Toxicol Grp, Surrey, England
关键词
clofibrate; gene expression profiling; liver; methapyrilene; microarray; qRT-PCR; rat; toxicogenomics;
D O I
10.1289/ehp.6675
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
DNA microarrays and related tools offer promise for identification of pathways involved in toxic responses to xenobiotics. To be useful for risk assessment, experimental data must be challenged for reliability and interlaboratory reproducibility. Toward this goal, the Hepatotoxicity Working Group of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) Technical Committee on Application of Genomics to Mechanism-Based Risk Assessment evaluated and compared biological and gene expression responses in rats exposed to two model hepatotoxins-clofibrate and methapyrilene. This collaborative effort provided an unprecedented opportunity for the working group to evaluate and compare multiple biological, genomic, and toxicological parameters across different laboratories and microarray platforms. Many of the results from this collaboration are presented in accompanying articles in this mini-monograph, whereas others have been published previously. In vivo studies for both compounds were conducted in two laboratories using a standard experimental protocol, and RNA samples were distributed to 16 laboratories for analysis on six microarray platforms. Histopathology, clinical chemistry, and organ weight changes were consistent with reported effects. Gene expression results demonstrated reasonable agreement between laboratories and across platforms. Discrepancies in expression profiles of some individual genes were largely due to platform differences and approaches to data analysis rather than to biological or interlaboratory variability. Despite these discrepancies there was overall agreement in the biological pathways affected by these compounds, demonstrating that transcriptional profiling is reproducible between laboratories and can reliably identify affected pathways necessary to provide mechanistic insight. This effort represents an important first step toward the use of transcriptional profiling in risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 427
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Hepatic microsomal enzyme induction, beta-oxidation, and cell proliferation following administration of clofibrate, gemfibrozil, or bezafibrate in the CD rat [J].
Amacher, DE ;
Beck, R ;
Schomaker, SJ ;
Kenny, CV .
TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 142 (01) :143-150
[2]   Clofibrate-induced gene expression changes in rat liver: A cross-laboratory analysis using membrane cDNA arrays [J].
Baker, VA ;
Harries, HM ;
Waring, JF ;
Duggan, CM ;
Ni, HA ;
Jolly, RA ;
Yoon, LW ;
De Souza, AT ;
Schmid, JE ;
Brown, RH ;
Ulrich, RG ;
Rockett, JC .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2004, 112 (04) :428-438
[3]   Toxicogenomics-based discrimination of toxic mechanism in HepG2 human hepatoma cells [J].
Burczynski, ME ;
McMillian, M ;
Ciervo, J ;
Li, L ;
Parker, JB ;
Dunn, RT ;
Hicken, S ;
Farr, S ;
Johnson, MD .
TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 58 (02) :399-415
[4]  
*CDER PHRMA AASLD, 2002, CDER PHRMA AASLD C
[5]   Cross-site comparison of gene expression data reveals high similarity [J].
Chu, TM ;
Deng, SB ;
Wolfinger, R ;
Paules, RS ;
Hamadeh, HK .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2004, 112 (04) :449-455
[6]   Central role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in the actions of peroxisome proliferators [J].
Corton, JC ;
Anderson, SP ;
Stauber, A .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY, 2000, 40 :491-518
[7]   Monitoring expression of genes involved in drug metabolism and toxicology using DNA microarrays [J].
Gerhold, D ;
Lu, MQ ;
Xu, J ;
Austin, C ;
Caskey, CT ;
Rushmore, T .
PHYSIOLOGICAL GENOMICS, 2001, 5 (04) :161-170
[8]   Quantitative PCR deconstruction of discrepancies between results reported by different hybridization platforms [J].
Goodsaid, FM ;
Smith, RJ ;
Rosenblum, IY .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2004, 112 (04) :456-459
[9]   EFFECTS OF METHAPYRILENE ON RAT HEPATIC XENOBIOTIC METABOLIZING ENZYMES AND LIVER MORPHOLOGY [J].
GRAICHEN, ME ;
NEPTUN, DA ;
DENT, JG ;
POPP, JA ;
LEONARD, TB .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1985, 5 (01) :165-174
[10]   PPAR: A mediator of peroxisome proliferator action [J].
Green, S .
MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 1995, 333 (1-2) :101-109