Upregulated long non-coding RNAs demonstrate promising efficacy for breast cancer detection: a meta-analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Yu, Guozheng [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Wei [2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Linyan [1 ,2 ]
Xia, Lin [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hubei Polytech Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Huangshi Cent Hosp, Edong Healthcare Grp,Affiliated Hosp, Huangshi, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Polytech Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Hubei Key Lab Kidney Dis Pathogenesis & Intervent, Huangshi Cent Hosp,Edong Healthcare Grp, Huangshi, Peoples R China
[3] Hubei Polytech Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Clin Lab, Huangshi Cent Hosp,Edong Healthcare Grp, Huangshi, Peoples R China
[4] Hubei Polytech Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Huangshi Cent Hosp,Edong Healthcare Grp, 293 Yiyuan St, Huangshi 435000, Hubei, Peoples R China
来源
ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY | 2018年 / 11卷
关键词
lncRNA; breast cancer; diagnosis; meta-analysis; CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE; BIOMARKER; EXPRESSION; DIAGNOSIS; PLASMA; SERUM;
D O I
10.2147/OTT.S152241
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Purpose: Focusing on the latest literature, dysregulated long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been extensively explored in breast cancer (BC) research. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to synthesize the evidence on the diagnostic performance of abnormally expressed lncRNAs for BC. Materials and methods: Relevant studies were searched in multiple electronic databases. The Quality Assessment of Diagnosis Accuracy Studies II criteria were applied to assess the quality of included studies. The bivariate meta-analysis model was applied to synthesize the diagnostic parameters using Stata 12.0 software. Publication bias was judged in terms of the Deek's funnel plot asymmetry test. Results: We included 10 eligible studies, which comprised 835 BC patients and 725 paired controls for this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, likelihood ratio positive, likelihood ratio negative, and area under the curve (AUC) of upregulated lncRNA expression signature in confirming BC were 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70-0.85), 0.80 (95% CI: 0.73-0.85), 14.61 (95% CI: 10.91-19.55), 3.90 (95% CI: 3.03-5.02), 0.27 (95% CI: 0.20-0.36), and 0.86, respectively. Stratified analyses yielded a sensitivity of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80-0.86) for serum-based analysis, which was higher than plasma-based analysis, whereas plasma-based analysis revealed a greater specificity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91). Moreover, lncRNA-homeotic genes (HOX) transcript antisense RNA showed a pooled specificity of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84-0.93) and AUC of 0.86, which were superior to performances by lncRNA-metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript-1 and -H19 in diagnosing BC. Notably, the analysis based on cancer subtypes demonstrated that lncRNA expression signature could distinguish triple-negative BC (lacks estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression) from non-triple-negative BC, with an AUC of 0.85. Conclusion: Upregulated lncRNAs reveal an immense potential as novel non-invasive biomarker(s) that could complement BC diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1491 / 1499
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diagnostic efficacy of long non-coding RNA in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dai, Shui-Ping
    Jin, Jing
    Li, Wei-Min
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 94 (1116) : 578 - 587
  • [32] The prognostic significance of long non-coding RNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma: An updated meta-analysis
    Liu, Jie
    Wei, Yue
    Wang, Tao
    Zhang, Zhexiao
    Huang, Hairong
    Wang, Chenfei
    Li, Huawen
    Jia, Qing
    Wu, Hongfu
    Zou, Tangbin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MARKERS, 2020, 35 (04): : 3 - 11
  • [33] Long non-coding RNAs as promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets in cervical cancer
    Begliarzade, Sema
    Beilerli, Aferin
    Sufianov, Albert
    Tamrazov, Rasim
    Kudriashov, Valentin
    Ilyasova, Tatiana
    Liang, Yanchao
    Beylerli, Ozal
    NON-CODING RNA RESEARCH, 2023, 8 (02): : 233 - 239
  • [34] Metastatic colorectal cancer: Perspectives on long non-coding RNAs and promising therapeutics
    Tang, Chunyuan
    Liu, Junqing
    Hu, Qingqing
    Zeng, Su
    Yu, Lushan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 908
  • [35] Exosomal non-coding RNAs: a promising cancer biomarker
    Yang, Huan
    Fu, Hailong
    Xu, Wenrong
    Zhang, Xu
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 54 (12) : 1871 - 1879
  • [36] Comprehensive analysis of long non-coding RNAs in human breast cancer clinical subtypes
    Su, Xiaoping
    Malouf, Gabriel G.
    Chen, Yunxin
    Zhang, Jianping
    Yao, Hui
    Valero, Vicente
    Weinstein, John N.
    Spano, Jean-Philippe
    Meric-Bernstam, Funda
    Khayat, David
    Esteva, Francisco J.
    ONCOTARGET, 2014, 5 (20) : 9864 - 9876
  • [37] Long non-coding RNAs and their targets as potential biomarkers in breast cancer
    Khalid, Maryam
    Paracha, Rehan Zafar
    Nisar, Maryum
    Malik, Sumaira
    Tariq, Salma
    Arshad, Iqra
    Siddiqa, Amnah
    Hussain, Zamir
    Ahmad, Jamil
    Ali, Amjad
    IET SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2021, 15 (05) : 137 - 147
  • [38] Molecular signatures of long non-coding RNAs in breast cancer patients
    Baumbusch, L. O.
    Reiche, K.
    Schutt, K.
    Schreiber, S.
    Due, E. U.
    Lueders, T.
    Kristensen, V. N.
    Horn, F.
    Hackermueller, J.
    Borresen-Dale, A. L.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 8 (05): : 12 - 12
  • [39] Current Status of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Human Breast Cancer
    Cerk, Stefanie
    Schwarzenbacher, Daniela
    Adiprasito, Jan Basri
    Stotz, Michael
    Hutterer, Georg C.
    Gerger, Armin
    Ling, Hui
    Calin, George Adrian
    Pichler, Martin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2016, 17 (09)
  • [40] Long non-coding RNAs: Functional regulatory players in breast cancer
    Youness, Rana Ahmed
    Gad, Mohamed Zakaria
    NON-CODING RNA RESEARCH, 2019, 4 (01): : 36 - 44