The relationship between social values for ecosystem services and global land cover: An empirical analysis

被引:119
作者
Brown, Greg [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Geog Planning & Environm Management, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
Ecosystem services; Land cover; Social values; PPGIS; Participatory mapping; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION GIS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; LANDSCAPE VALUES; CLASSIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; VALUATION; TYPOLOGY; WORLDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.004
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Considerable effort has been directed into separate but related research foci the study of ecosystem services and participatory mapping methods. The two research foci intersect in the mapping of place-based values, an operational form of social values for ecosystem services that uses public participation GIS (PPGIS) methods. The social valuation of ecosystem services through participatory mapping offers an alternative valuation approach to economic valuation of ecosystem services. This study analyzes the spatial associations between global land cover which provides a proxy indicator of ecosystem services, and place-based values from 11 PPGIS studies completed in the U.S., Australia, and New Zealand that comprise a diverse set of temperate ecoregions. Key findings include: the highest frequencies of social values for ecosystem services were associated with forested land cover; water bodies were highly valuable relative to area occupied; and agricultural land and areas of permanent snow and ice were least valuable. Most land cover classes demonstrated high diversity of social values. The importance of different land cover types varies based on the selected evaluation criteria. Additional research is needed to determine whether economic and social valuation approaches provide complementary, contradictory, or redundant measures of the importance of landscapes for providing ecosystem services. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E58 / E68
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Social-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space [J].
Alessa, Lilian ;
Kliskey, Andrew ;
Brown, Gregory .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2008, 85 (01) :27-39
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, NATURES SERVICES SOC
[4]   Assessing spatial attributes of forest landscape values: an internet-based participatory mapping approach [J].
Beverly, Jennifer L. ;
Uto, Kinga ;
Wilkes, Justin ;
Bothwell, Peter .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2008, 38 (02) :289-303
[5]  
Bontemps S., 2011, Globcover Products Description and Validation Report
[6]   What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units [J].
Boyd, James ;
Banzhaf, Spencer .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 63 (2-3) :616-626
[7]  
Brabyn L., 1996, LANDSCAPE RES, V21, P277, DOI [10.1080/01426399608706493, DOI 10.1080/01426399608706493, 10.1080/01426399608706493.]
[8]   Classifying Landscape Character [J].
Brabyn, Lars .
LANDSCAPE RESEARCH, 2009, 34 (03) :299-321
[9]  
Brown G., 2006, International Journal of Tourism Research, V8, P101, DOI 10.1002/jtr.562
[10]   Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications [J].
Brown, G .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2005, 18 (01) :17-39