Risk

被引:59
作者
Pritchard, Duncan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Philosophy Psychol & Language Sci, Edinburgh EH8 9AD, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
epistemology; evidence; knowledge; luck; philosophy of law; risk; COUNTERFACTUAL THINKING; LUCK; PERCEPTION; ILLUSION; ACCOUNT;
D O I
10.1111/meta.12142
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In this article it is argued that the standard theoretical account of risk in the contemporary literature, which is cast along probabilistic lines, is flawed, in that it is unable to account for a particular kind of risk. In its place a modal account of risk is offered. Two applications of the modal account of risk are then explored. First, to epistemology, via the defence of an anti-risk condition on knowledge in place of the normal anti-luck condition. Second, to legal theory, where it is shown that this account of risk can cast light on the debate regarding the extent to which a criminal justice system can countenance the possibility of wrongful convictions.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 461
页数:26
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Allen R.J., 2008, Texas Tech Law Review, V41, P65, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.1150931, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1150931]
[2]   JUSTIFICATION, COHERENCE, AND EPISTEMIC RESPONSIBILITY IN LEGAL FACT-FINDING [J].
Amaya, Amalia .
EPISTEME-A JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2008, 5 (03) :306-319
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, NEW WAVES EPISTEMOLO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9780470752937.CH20, 10.1002/9780470752937.ch20]
[5]  
Bernecker S, 2011, ROUTL PHILOS COMPAN, P187
[6]   Thinking about luck [J].
Coffman, E. J. .
SYNTHESE, 2007, 158 (03) :385-398
[7]   DOES LUCK EXCLUDE CONTROL? DISCUSSION [J].
Coffman, E. J. .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2009, 87 (03) :499-504
[8]  
Gross SR, 2005, J CRIM LAW CRIM, V95, P523
[9]  
Hansson S.O., 2004, Techne Res. Philos. Technol, V8, P10, DOI DOI 10.5840/TECHNE2004818
[10]  
Hansson SvenOve., 2014, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Archive