Transatlantic Consensus Group on active surveillance and focal therapy for prostate cancer

被引:91
作者
Ahmed, Hashim U. [1 ]
Akin, Oguz [7 ]
Coleman, Jonathan A. [8 ]
Crane, Sarah [2 ]
Emberton, Mark [1 ]
Goldenberg, Larry [12 ]
Hricak, Hedvig [7 ]
Kattan, Mike W. [9 ]
Kurhanewicz, John [11 ]
Moore, Caroline M. [1 ]
Parker, Chris [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Polascik, Thomas J. [10 ]
Scardino, Peter
van As, Nicholas [6 ]
Villers, Arnauld [13 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Pelican Canc Fdn, Basingstoke, Hants, England
[3] Inst Canc Res, Sect Acad Radiotherapy, Sutton, Surrey, England
[4] Inst Canc Res, Dept Radiotherapy, Sutton, Surrey, England
[5] Royal Marsden Hosp, Sutton, Surrey, England
[6] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Acad Unit Radiotherapy & Oncol, Sutton, Surrey, England
[7] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[8] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Surg Urol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[9] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[10] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Canc Inst, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[11] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[12] Univ British Columbia, Dept Urol Sci, Gordon & Leslie Diamond Hlth Care Ctr, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[13] CHRU Lille, Hop Huriez, Serv Urol, Lille, France
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
focal therapy; active surveillance; multi-parametric MRI; template prostate mapping biopsies; risk stratification; trial design; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; GLEASON SCORE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; 4-KALLIKREIN PANEL; UNNECESSARY BIOPSY; FOLLOW-UP; MRI; AGGRESSIVENESS; TUMOR; MEN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10633.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To reach consensus on key issues for clinical practice and future research in active surveillance and focal therapy in managing localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A group of expert urologists, oncologists, radiologists, pathologists and computer scientists from North America and Europe met to discuss issues in patient population, interventions, comparators and outcome measures to use in both tissue-preserving strategies of active surveillance and focal therapy. Break-out sessions were formed to provide agreement or highlight areas of disagreement on individual topics which were then collated by a writing group into statements that formed the basis of this report and agreed upon by the whole Transatlantic Consensus Group. RESULTS The Transatlantic group propose that emerging diagnostic tools such as precision imaging and transperineal prostate mapping biopsy can improve prostate cancer care. These tools should be integrated into prostate cancer management and research so that better risk stratification and more effective treatment allocation can be applied. The group envisaged a process of care in which active surveillance, focal therapy, and radical treatments lie on a continuum of complementary therapies for men with a range of disease grades and burdens, rather than being applied in the mutually exclusive and competitive way they are now. CONCLUSION The changing landscape of prostate cancer epidemiology requires the medical community to re-evaluate the entire prostate cancer diagnostic and treatment pathway in order to minimize harms resulting from over-diagnosis and over-treatment. Precise risk stratification at every point in this pathway is required alongside paradigm shifts in our thinking about what constitutes cancer in the prostate.
引用
收藏
页码:1636 / 1647
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Current status of MRI for the diagnosis, staging and prognosis of prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy and active surveillance
    Villers, Arnauld
    Lemaitre, Laurent
    Haffner, Jeremie
    Puech, Philippe
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2009, 19 (03) : 274 - 282
  • [42] Developing a consensus statement for psychosocial support in active surveillance for prostate cancer
    Beckmann, Kerri
    Cahill, Declan
    Brown, Christian
    Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
    Kinsella, Netty
    BJUI COMPASS, 2023, 4 (01): : 104 - 113
  • [43] Quality of life in active surveillance for early prostate cancer
    Kato, Takuma
    Sugimoto, Mikio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (04) : 296 - 306
  • [44] Criticisms to patient selection in active surveillance in prostate cancer
    Gomez Veiga, Francisco
    Portela Pereira, Paula
    Vazquez-Martul Pazos, Dario
    Pertega Diaz, Sonia
    Martinez Breijo, Sara
    Mendez Diaz, Cristina
    Rodriguez, Esther
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2014, 67 (05): : 495 - 508
  • [45] Integration of multiparametric MRI into active surveillance of prostate cancer
    Holtz, Jamie N.
    Tay, Kae Jack
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    Gupta, Rajan T.
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2016, 12 (21) : 2513 - 2529
  • [46] MR Imaging for Prostate Cancer Screening and Active Surveillance
    Druskin, Sasha C.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 56 (02) : 251 - +
  • [47] Active surveillance for localized prostate cancer
    Staerman, F.
    Peyromaure, M.
    Irani, J.
    Gaschignard, N.
    Mottet, N.
    Soulie, M.
    Salomon, L.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2011, 21 (07): : 448 - 454
  • [48] Active surveillance for prostate cancer: can we modernize contemporary protocols to improve patient selection and outcomes in the focal therapy era?
    Tay, Kae Jack
    Mendez, Melissa
    Moul, Judd W.
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2015, 25 (03) : 185 - 190
  • [49] Active surveillance for localized prostate cancer
    Drouin, S. J.
    Roupret, M.
    Hamdy, F.
    Mottet, N.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2010, 20 : S181 - S185
  • [50] Current Management Strategy for Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer
    Syed, Jamil S.
    Javier-Desloges, Juan
    Tatzel, Stephanie
    Bhagat, Ansh
    Nguyen, Kevin A.
    Hwang, Kevin
    Kim, Sarah
    Sprenkle, Preston C.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2017, 19 (02)