Transatlantic Consensus Group on active surveillance and focal therapy for prostate cancer

被引:91
作者
Ahmed, Hashim U. [1 ]
Akin, Oguz [7 ]
Coleman, Jonathan A. [8 ]
Crane, Sarah [2 ]
Emberton, Mark [1 ]
Goldenberg, Larry [12 ]
Hricak, Hedvig [7 ]
Kattan, Mike W. [9 ]
Kurhanewicz, John [11 ]
Moore, Caroline M. [1 ]
Parker, Chris [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Polascik, Thomas J. [10 ]
Scardino, Peter
van As, Nicholas [6 ]
Villers, Arnauld [13 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Pelican Canc Fdn, Basingstoke, Hants, England
[3] Inst Canc Res, Sect Acad Radiotherapy, Sutton, Surrey, England
[4] Inst Canc Res, Dept Radiotherapy, Sutton, Surrey, England
[5] Royal Marsden Hosp, Sutton, Surrey, England
[6] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Acad Unit Radiotherapy & Oncol, Sutton, Surrey, England
[7] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[8] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Surg Urol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[9] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[10] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Canc Inst, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[11] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[12] Univ British Columbia, Dept Urol Sci, Gordon & Leslie Diamond Hlth Care Ctr, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[13] CHRU Lille, Hop Huriez, Serv Urol, Lille, France
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
focal therapy; active surveillance; multi-parametric MRI; template prostate mapping biopsies; risk stratification; trial design; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; GLEASON SCORE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; 4-KALLIKREIN PANEL; UNNECESSARY BIOPSY; FOLLOW-UP; MRI; AGGRESSIVENESS; TUMOR; MEN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10633.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To reach consensus on key issues for clinical practice and future research in active surveillance and focal therapy in managing localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A group of expert urologists, oncologists, radiologists, pathologists and computer scientists from North America and Europe met to discuss issues in patient population, interventions, comparators and outcome measures to use in both tissue-preserving strategies of active surveillance and focal therapy. Break-out sessions were formed to provide agreement or highlight areas of disagreement on individual topics which were then collated by a writing group into statements that formed the basis of this report and agreed upon by the whole Transatlantic Consensus Group. RESULTS The Transatlantic group propose that emerging diagnostic tools such as precision imaging and transperineal prostate mapping biopsy can improve prostate cancer care. These tools should be integrated into prostate cancer management and research so that better risk stratification and more effective treatment allocation can be applied. The group envisaged a process of care in which active surveillance, focal therapy, and radical treatments lie on a continuum of complementary therapies for men with a range of disease grades and burdens, rather than being applied in the mutually exclusive and competitive way they are now. CONCLUSION The changing landscape of prostate cancer epidemiology requires the medical community to re-evaluate the entire prostate cancer diagnostic and treatment pathway in order to minimize harms resulting from over-diagnosis and over-treatment. Precise risk stratification at every point in this pathway is required alongside paradigm shifts in our thinking about what constitutes cancer in the prostate.
引用
收藏
页码:1636 / 1647
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Active surveillance in prostate cancer
    Erne, E.
    Kaufmann, S.
    Nikolaou, K.
    Stenzl, A.
    Bedke, J.
    UROLOGE, 2019, 58 (05): : 511 - 517
  • [32] Active surveillance and surgery in localized prostate cancer
    Kwon, O.
    Hong, S. K.
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2014, 66 (03) : 175 - 187
  • [33] Active Surveillance for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2017, 18 (10)
  • [34] Active surveillance or prostate cancer
    Mottet, N.
    ONCOLOGIE, 2012, 14 (02) : 74 - 78
  • [35] Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: is there a "middle ground" between active surveillance and definitive treatment
    Demirel, Cihan H.
    Altok, Muammer
    Davis, John W.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2019, 21 (01): : 37 - 44
  • [36] Focal therapy and prostate cancer
    Lazzeri, Massimo
    Losa, Andrea
    Buffi, Nicolomaria
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    Fossati, Nicola
    Abrate, Alberto
    Larcher, Alessandro
    Lista, Giuliana
    Mistretta, Alessandro
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2013, 80 (04) : 283 - 289
  • [37] Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Complications and Their Treatment
    Rakauskas, Arnas
    Marra, Giancarlo
    Heidegger, Isabel
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Kretschmer, Alexander
    Zattoni, Fabio
    Preisser, Felix
    Tilki, Derya
    Tsaur, Igor
    van den Bergh, Roderick
    Kesch, Claudia
    Ceci, Francesco
    Fankhauser, Christian
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Valerio, Massimo
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8
  • [38] Focal therapy of prostate cancer
    Pahernik, S.
    Hadaschik, B.
    Schlemmer, H. -P.
    ONKOLOGE, 2015, 21 (09): : 797 - +
  • [39] Best practice in active surveillance for men with prostate cancer: a Prostate Cancer UK consensus statement
    Merriel, Samuel W. D.
    Hetherington, Liz
    Seggie, Andrew
    Castle, Joanna T.
    Cross, William
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent J.
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Ashworth, Mark
    Bradley, Robert E.
    Cass, Keith
    Cornford, Philip
    Keanie, Julian
    Little, Scott
    Mastris, Ken
    Nairn, Adam
    Oxley, Jon
    Parker, Chris
    Patel, Amit
    Porter, Robin
    Powell, Lucy
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Roland, Martin
    Varma, Murali
    Victor, Deborah
    Waymont, Clare
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (01) : 47 - 54
  • [40] Current Trends and New Frontiers in Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Mendez, Melissa H.
    Joh, Daniel Y.
    Gupta, Rajan
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 16 (06)