Transatlantic Consensus Group on active surveillance and focal therapy for prostate cancer

被引:91
|
作者
Ahmed, Hashim U. [1 ]
Akin, Oguz [7 ]
Coleman, Jonathan A. [8 ]
Crane, Sarah [2 ]
Emberton, Mark [1 ]
Goldenberg, Larry [12 ]
Hricak, Hedvig [7 ]
Kattan, Mike W. [9 ]
Kurhanewicz, John [11 ]
Moore, Caroline M. [1 ]
Parker, Chris [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Polascik, Thomas J. [10 ]
Scardino, Peter
van As, Nicholas [6 ]
Villers, Arnauld [13 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Pelican Canc Fdn, Basingstoke, Hants, England
[3] Inst Canc Res, Sect Acad Radiotherapy, Sutton, Surrey, England
[4] Inst Canc Res, Dept Radiotherapy, Sutton, Surrey, England
[5] Royal Marsden Hosp, Sutton, Surrey, England
[6] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Acad Unit Radiotherapy & Oncol, Sutton, Surrey, England
[7] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[8] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Surg Urol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[9] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[10] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Canc Inst, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[11] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[12] Univ British Columbia, Dept Urol Sci, Gordon & Leslie Diamond Hlth Care Ctr, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[13] CHRU Lille, Hop Huriez, Serv Urol, Lille, France
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
focal therapy; active surveillance; multi-parametric MRI; template prostate mapping biopsies; risk stratification; trial design; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; GLEASON SCORE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; 4-KALLIKREIN PANEL; UNNECESSARY BIOPSY; FOLLOW-UP; MRI; AGGRESSIVENESS; TUMOR; MEN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10633.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To reach consensus on key issues for clinical practice and future research in active surveillance and focal therapy in managing localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A group of expert urologists, oncologists, radiologists, pathologists and computer scientists from North America and Europe met to discuss issues in patient population, interventions, comparators and outcome measures to use in both tissue-preserving strategies of active surveillance and focal therapy. Break-out sessions were formed to provide agreement or highlight areas of disagreement on individual topics which were then collated by a writing group into statements that formed the basis of this report and agreed upon by the whole Transatlantic Consensus Group. RESULTS The Transatlantic group propose that emerging diagnostic tools such as precision imaging and transperineal prostate mapping biopsy can improve prostate cancer care. These tools should be integrated into prostate cancer management and research so that better risk stratification and more effective treatment allocation can be applied. The group envisaged a process of care in which active surveillance, focal therapy, and radical treatments lie on a continuum of complementary therapies for men with a range of disease grades and burdens, rather than being applied in the mutually exclusive and competitive way they are now. CONCLUSION The changing landscape of prostate cancer epidemiology requires the medical community to re-evaluate the entire prostate cancer diagnostic and treatment pathway in order to minimize harms resulting from over-diagnosis and over-treatment. Precise risk stratification at every point in this pathway is required alongside paradigm shifts in our thinking about what constitutes cancer in the prostate.
引用
收藏
页码:1636 / 1647
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Herlemann, Annika
    Stief, Christian G.
    UROLOGE, 2016, 55 (02): : 269 - 278
  • [22] Active surveillance for prostate cancer: past, present and future
    Singer, Eric A.
    Kaushal, Aradhana
    Turkbey, Baris
    Couvillon, Anna
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Parnes, Howard L.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2012, 24 (03) : 243 - 250
  • [23] Use of mpMRI in active surveillance for localized prostate cancer
    Scarpato, Kristen R.
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (07) : 320 - 325
  • [24] Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 16 (04) : 1 - 10
  • [25] Focal Therapy in Prostate Cancer: International Multidisciplinary Consensus on Trial Design
    van den Bos, Willemien
    Muller, Berrend G.
    Ahmed, Hashim
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Barret, Eric
    Crouzet, Sebastien
    Eggener, Scott E.
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Joniau, Steven
    Kovacs, Gyoergy
    Pahernik, Sascha
    de la Rosette, Jean J.
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Salomon, Georg
    Ward, John F.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (06) : 1078 - 1083
  • [26] Morbidity of Focal Therapy in the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer
    Barret, Eric
    Ahallal, Youness
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Galiano, Marc
    Cosset, Jean-Marc
    Validire, Pierre
    Macek, Petr
    Durand, Matthieu
    Prapotnich, Dominique
    Rozet, Francois
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (04) : 618 - 622
  • [27] Innovations in prostate biopsy strategies for active surveillance and focal therapy
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Hung, Andrew J.
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2011, 21 (02) : 115 - 120
  • [28] Is focal therapy the future for prostate cancer?
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Emberton, Mark
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2010, 6 (02) : 261 - 268
  • [29] Active surveillance should not be routinely considered in ISUP grade group 2 prostate cancer
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Leni, Riccardo
    Plagakis, Sophie
    Stabile, Armando
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    BMC UROLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [30] Evaluation of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging at Inclusion in an Active Surveillance Protocol for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Somford, Diederik M.
    Hoeks, Caroline M.
    Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A.
    Hambrock, Thomas
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Vergunst, Henk
    Smits, Geert A.
    Oddens, Jorg R.
    van Oort, Inge M.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2013, 48 (03) : 152 - 157