The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Performance on Financial Risk

被引:3
|
作者
Hsiao, Li-Peng [1 ]
Chen, Weitzu [2 ]
Lin, Jwu-Rong [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Culture Univ, Dept Accounting, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taipei Univ, Dept Accountancy, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Tunghai Univ, Dept Int Business, Taichung, Taiwan
来源
NTU MANAGEMENT REVIEW | 2020年 / 30卷 / 02期
关键词
corporate social responsibility; market risk; liquidity risk; cost of capital; INFORMATION ASYMMETRY; LIQUIDITY RISK; COST; MARKET; DISCLOSURE; MANAGEMENT; QUALITY; ASK; IMPROVE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.6226/NTUMR.202008_30(2).0007
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Since the UN Global Compact was proposed in 1999, entrepreneurs and institutions around the world have placed a steadily increasing emphasis on corporate social responsibility (CSR). Accompanying the increased levels of CSR reporting and activities, researchers raise questions regarding whether the aim of a firm's operations is always to maximize shareholder value regardless of other potential motivating factors, an assumption frequently stated in past literature. The present study infers that a firm with superior CSR performance experiences lower market risk and liquidity risk, from empirically assessing the effect of CSR performance on financial risk. The robustness test also finds that superior CSR performance reduces the cost of capital. Furthermore, the study documents that the performance of corporate governance activities increases the cost of capital. Although there is a positive association between corporate governance performance and the cost of capital, prior research suggests that the corporate governance dimension is distinct from other social and environmental dimensions of CSR. Therefore, if the study excludes the corporate governance dimension from CSR activities, the result supports the hypothesis that CSR performance, in sum, is negatively related to the cost of capital.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 310
页数:54
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Corporate social responsibility and financial performance
    Elouidani, Abdelkbir
    Zoubir, Faical
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND FINANCE, 2015, 4 (01) : 74 - 85
  • [2] The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Religiosity, Individual Social Responsibility, and Corporate Financial Performance in South Korea
    Jang, Sumi
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2021, 8 (08): : 525 - 532
  • [3] The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Cost on Financial Performance
    Najihah, Naila
    Indriastuti, Maya
    Suhendi, Chrisna
    COMPLEX, INTELLIGENT AND SOFTWARE INTENSIVE SYSTEMS, 2021, 1194 : 418 - 425
  • [4] Corporate Opacity, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Financial Performance
    Kim, Sooin
    Yoo, Jungmin
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 49
  • [5] CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE - IS THERE A LINK?
    Skare, Marinko
    Golja, Tea
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2012, 25 : 215 - 242
  • [6] CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE - IS THERE A LINK?
    Skare, Marinko
    Golja, Tea
    5TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MACROECONOMIC MANAGEMENT: REFLECTIONS ON THE WORLD IN TURMOIL, VOL 2, 2011, : 1521 - +
  • [7] Corporate social responsibility, financial performance and risk in times of economic instability
    Braune, Eric
    Charosky, Pablo
    Hikkerova, Lubica
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & GOVERNANCE, 2019, 23 (04) : 1007 - 1021
  • [8] Corporate social responsibility, financial performance and risk in times of economic instability
    Eric Braune
    Pablo Charosky
    Lubica Hikkerova
    Journal of Management and Governance, 2019, 23 : 1007 - 1021
  • [9] Financial Performance Gaps and Corporate Social Responsibility
    Deng, Xinming
    Long, Xianyi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (12)
  • [10] Corporate social responsibility and hotel financial performance
    Babajee, Reena Bhattu
    Seetanah, Boopen
    Nunkoo, Robin
    Gopy-Ramdhany, Narvada
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MARKETING & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 31 (02) : 226 - 246