Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma With Minimal Fat from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Non-contrast Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

被引:2
|
作者
Jomoto, Wataru [1 ,2 ]
Takaki, Haruyuki [1 ,6 ]
Yamamoto, Shingo [3 ]
Kanematsu, Akihiro [3 ]
Igeta, Masataka [4 ]
Hirota, Seiichi [5 ]
Yamakado, Koichiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Hyogo Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Nishinomiya, Japan
[2] Hyogo Med Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol Technol, Nishinomiya, Japan
[3] Hyogo Med Univ, Dept Urol, Nishinomiya, Japan
[4] Hyogo Med Univ, Dept Biostat, Nishinomiya, Japan
[5] Hyogo Med Univ, Dept Surg Pathol, Nishinomiya, Japan
[6] Hyogo Med Univ, Dept Radiol, 1-1 Mukogawa cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 6638501, Japan
来源
IN VIVO | 2022年 / 36卷 / 06期
关键词
Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat; clear cell renal cell carcinoma; magnetic resonance imaging; prediction model; apparent diffusion coefficient; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; VISIBLE FAT; DIAGNOSIS; LESIONS; MASSES;
D O I
10.21873/invivo.13016
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background/Aim: This study was conducted to ascertain the optimal combination of non-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences for the differential diagnosis between small angiomyolipoma (AML) with minimal fat and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). Patients and Methods: Thirty-nine patients with pathologically proven AML with minimal fat (n=6) or CCRCC (n=33) measuring 4 cm or less were included. All underwent MR imaging before partial nephrectomy or percutaneous biopsy. Four quantitative parameters of tumors were evaluated: signal intensity (SI) index of T1W- gradientecho imaging, SI index of T2- fat suppression imaging (T2SI index), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, and standard deviation (SD) of ADC. These quantitative parameters were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. The optimal combination of quantitative parameters was sought using logistic regression analysis. Results: Comparison of quantitative parameters showed that the T2SI index (median, AML with minimal fat vs. CCRCC; 0.74 vs. 1.27, p<0.001), ADC value (1.12 vs. 1.75, p=0.005), and SD of ADC (104 vs. 233, p<0.001) were significantly lower in AML with minimal fat than CCRCC. From the ROC curve analysis, the highest area under the curve (1.000; 100% sensitivity; 100% specificity) was obtained using the logistic regression model with the SD of ADC and T2-SI index or ADC value as explanatory variables. Conclusion: SD of ADC combined with T2-SI index or ADC value exhibited the highest diagnostic performance for differentiating small AML with minimal fat from CCRCC.
引用
收藏
页码:2790 / 2799
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of angiomyolipoma with minimal fat from clear cell renal cell carcinoma
    Tanaka, Hajime
    Yoshida, Soichiro
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    Ishii, Chikako
    Tanaka, Hiroshi
    Koga, Fumitaka
    Saito, Kazutaka
    Masuda, Hitoshi
    Kawakami, Satoru
    Kihara, Kazunori
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 18 (10) : 727 - 730
  • [2] Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat: Differentiation From Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma by Texture Analysis on CT Images
    Yan, Lifen
    Liu, Zaiyi
    Wang, Guangyi
    Huang, Yanqi
    Liu, Yubao
    Yu, Yuanxin
    Liang, Changhong
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (09) : 1115 - 1121
  • [3] Predictive Value of Chemical-Shift MRI in Distinguishing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma
    Jhaveri, Kartik S.
    Elmi, Azadeh
    Hosseini-Nik, Hooman
    Hedgire, Sandeep
    Evans, Andrew
    Jewett, Michael
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (01) : W79 - W86
  • [4] Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: differentiation on MDCT using classification and regression tree analysis-based algorithm
    Woo, Sungmin
    Cho, Jeong Yeon
    Kim, Seung Hyup
    Kim, Sang Youn
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2014, 55 (10) : 1258 - 1269
  • [5] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the differentiation of low and high grade clear cell renal carcinoma
    Cornelis, F.
    Tricaud, E.
    Lasserre, A. S.
    Petitpierre, F.
    Bernhard, J. C.
    Le Bras, Y.
    Yacoub, M.
    Bouzgarrou, M.
    Ravaud, A.
    Grenier, N.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (01) : 24 - 31
  • [6] Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation of morphological and enhancement features from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging
    Sung, Chang Kyu
    Kim, See Hyung
    Woo, Sungmin
    Moon, Min Hoan
    Kim, Sang Youn
    Kim, Seung Hyup
    Cho, Jeong Yeon
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2016, 57 (09) : 1114 - 1122
  • [7] Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat: Can It Be Differentiated from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma by Using Standard MR Techniques?
    Hindman, Nicole
    Ngo, Long
    Genega, Elizabeth M.
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Wei, Jesse
    Braza, Julia M.
    Rofsky, Neil M.
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (02) : 468 - 477
  • [8] Differentiation between fat-poor angiomyolipoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: qualitative and quantitative analysis using arterial spin labeling MR imaging
    Ye, Jing
    Xu, Qing
    Wang, Shou-An
    Zheng, Jin
    Zhu, Qing-Qiang
    Dou, Wei-Qiang
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (02) : 512 - 519
  • [9] Utility of radiomics features of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma: model development and external validation
    Matsumoto, Shunya
    Arita, Yuki
    Yoshida, Soichiro
    Fukushima, Hiroshi
    Kimura, Koichiro
    Yamada, Ichiro
    Tanaka, Hajime
    Yagi, Fumiko
    Yokoyama, Minato
    Matsuoka, Yoh
    Oya, Mototsugu
    Tateishi, Ukihide
    Jinzaki, Masahiro
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (06) : 2178 - 2186
  • [10] Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: Differentiation from papillary renal cell carcinoma by helical CT
    Zhang, Y. -Y.
    Luo, S.
    Liu, Y.
    Xu, R. -T.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 68 (04) : 365 - 370