共 50 条
Assessing uncertainties in crop and pasture ensemble model simulations of productivity and N2O emissions
被引:113
|作者:
Ehrhardt, Fiona
[1
]
Soussana, Jean-Francois
[1
]
Bellocchi, Gianni
[2
]
Grace, Peter
[3
]
McAuliffe, Russel
[4
]
Recous, Sylvie
[5
]
Sandor, Renata
[2
,6
]
Smith, Pete
[7
]
Snow, Val
[4
]
Migliorati, Massimiliano de Antoni
Basso, Bruno
[8
]
Bhatia, Arti
[9
]
Brilli, Lorenzo
[10
]
Doltra, Jordi
[11
]
Dorich, Christopher D.
[12
]
Doro, Luca
[13
]
Fitton, Nuala
[7
]
Giacomini, Sandro J.
[14
]
Grant, Brian
[15
]
Harrison, Matthew T.
[16
]
Jones, Stephanie K.
[17
]
Kirschbaum, Miko U. F.
[18
]
Klumpp, Katja
[2
]
Laville, Patricia
[19
]
Leonard, Joel
[20
]
Liebig, Mark
[21
]
Lieffering, Mark
[22
]
Martin, Raphael
[2
]
Massad, Raia S.
[19
]
Meier, Elizabeth
[23
]
Merbold, Lutz
[24
,25
]
Moore, Andrew D.
[26
]
Myrgiotis, Vasileios
[17
]
Newton, Paul
[22
]
Pattey, Elizabeth
[15
]
Rolinski, Susanne
[27
]
Sharp, Joanna
[28
]
Smith, Ward N.
[15
]
Wu, Lianhai
[29
]
Zhang, Qing
[30
]
机构:
[1] INRA, Paris, France
[2] INRA, UMR Ecosyst Prairial, Clermont Ferrand, France
[3] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Lincoln Res Ctr, AgRes, Lincoln, New Zealand
[5] INRA, UMR FARE, Reims, France
[6] Inst Agr, CAR, HAS, Martonvasar, Hungary
[7] Univ Aberdeen, Inst Biol & Environm Sci, Aberdeen, Scotland
[8] Michigan State Univ, Dept Geol Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[9] Indian Agr Res Inst, New Delhi, India
[10] Univ Florence, DISPAA, Florence, Italy
[11] Cantabrian Agr Res & Training Ctr CIFA, Muriedas, Spain
[12] Colorado State Univ, NREL, Ft Collins, CO USA
[13] Univ Sassari, Desertificat Res Ctr, Sassari, Italy
[14] Fed Univ Santa Maria UFSM, Soil Dept, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
[15] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Ottawa Res & Dev Ctr, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[16] Tasmanian Inst Agr, Burnie, Tas, Australia
[17] SRUC, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[18] Landcare Res, Palmerston North, New Zealand
[19] Univ Paris Saclay, INRA, UMR ECOSYS, Thiverval Grignon, France
[20] INRA, UR AgroImpact, Laon, France
[21] USDA ARS, Mandan, ND USA
[22] Grasslands Res Ctr, AgRes, Palmerston North, New Zealand
[23] CSIRO, Agr & Food, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[24] Inst Agr Sci, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
[25] Mazingira Ctr, ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya
[26] CSIRO, Black Mt Sci & Innovat Precinct, Agr & Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[27] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, Potsdam, Germany
[28] New Zealand Inst Plant & Food Res, Christchurch, New Zealand
[29] Rothamsted Res, Sustainable Soils & Grassland Syst, Harpenden, Devon, England
[30] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, LAPC, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金:
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词:
agriculture;
benchmarking;
biogeochemical models;
climate change;
greenhouse gases;
nitrous oxide;
soil;
yield;
GREENHOUSE-GAS MITIGATION;
NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS;
GRAZING MANAGEMENT;
CLIMATE;
WHEAT;
SYSTEMS;
CARBON;
YIELD;
GRASSLAND;
BUDGET;
D O I:
10.1111/gcb.13965
中图分类号:
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号:
090705 ;
摘要:
Simulation models are extensively used to predict agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas emissions. However, the uncertainties of (reduced) model ensemble simulations have not been assessed systematically for variables affecting food security and climate change mitigation, within multi-species agricultural contexts. We report an international model comparison and benchmarking exercise, showing the potential of multi-model ensembles to predict productivity and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions for wheat, maize, rice and temperate grasslands. Using a multi-stage modelling protocol, from blind simulations (stage 1) to partial (stages 2-4) and full calibration (stage 5), 24 process-based biogeochemical models were assessed individually or as an ensemble against long-term experimental data from four temperate grassland and five arable crop rotation sites spanning four continents. Comparisons were performed by reference to the experimental uncertainties of observed yields and N2O emissions. Results showed that across sites and crop/grassland types, 23%-40% of the uncalibrated individual models were within two standard deviations (SD) of observed yields, while 42 (rice) to 96% (grasslands) of the models were within 1 SD of observed N2O emissions. At stage 1, ensembles formed by the three lowest prediction model errors predicted both yields and N2O emissions within experimental uncertainties for 44% and 33% of the crop and grassland growth cycles, respectively. Partial model calibration (stages 2-4) markedly reduced prediction errors of the full model ensemble E-median for crop grain yields (from 36% at stage 1 down to 4% on average) and grassland productivity (from 44% to 27%) and to a lesser and more variable extent for N2O emissions. Yield-scaled N2O emissions (N2O emissions divided by crop yields) were ranked accurately by three-model ensembles across crop species and field sites. The potential of using process-based model ensembles to predict jointly productivity and N2O emissions at field scale is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:E603 / E616
页数:14
相关论文