Combination of microalgae cultivation with membrane processes for the treatment of municipal wastewater

被引:8
作者
Chen, Lu [1 ]
Wei, Jiang [2 ]
Wang, Weiguo [1 ]
Wang, Cunwen [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Inst Technol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Green Chem Proc, Wuhan 430073, Peoples R China
[2] Alfa Laval Nakskov AS, DK-4900 Nakskov, Denmark
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
filtration; flocculation; microalgae; wastewater treatment; REVERSE-OSMOSIS; FLOCCULATION; REMOVAL; ALGAE; NANOFILTRATION; FILTRATION; EFFLUENT; SYSTEM; REUSE;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2013.509
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The treatment of wastewater by microalgae cultivation has attracted more and more attention. However, the way to harvest microalgae cells from the wastewater and the treatment of the large quantity of residual solution have become critical issues. In this work, a new approach for the treatment of municipal wastewater is presented. The combination of flocculation for removing mainly microalgae and thereafter membrane filtration for chemical oxygen demand (COD) and conductivity reduction of the residual solution after flocculation is discussed. The COD concentration of the wastewater decreased from 260 to 84 mg/L after flocculation by chitosan. Five ultrafiltration (UF) membranes and two nanofiltration (NF) membranes were used for filtration to find a suitable membrane for COD and conductivity reduction. Among the five UF membranes, GR82PE showed the best performance, whose permeate flux and COD retention at 4 bar were 189.66 L/(m(2).h) and 43.03%, respectively. NF membranes showed higher COD and conductivity retentions than UF membranes. The COD retention of Desal5-DK reached 98.3% at 20 bar. Lastly, the flux recovery after the filtration test of each membrane is also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:2374 / 2381
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 87981996 GB
[2]   Cultivation of microalgae (Oscillatoria okeni and Chlorella vulgaris) using tilapia-pond effluent and a comparison of their biomass removal efficiency [J].
Attasat, S. ;
Wanichpongpan, P. ;
Ruenglertpanyakul, W. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 67 (02) :271-277
[3]   Comparative study of different nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dairy effluent treatment by dead-end filtration [J].
Balannec, B ;
Vourch, M ;
Rabiller-Baudry, M ;
Chaufer, B .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 42 (02) :195-200
[4]   Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes - Use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy [J].
Bowen, WR ;
Mohammad, AW ;
Hilal, N .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1997, 126 (01) :91-105
[5]   Optimal conditions of different flocculation methods for harvesting Scenedesmus sp cultivated in an open-pond system [J].
Chen, Lu ;
Wang, Cunwen ;
Wang, Weiguo ;
Wei, Jiang .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 133 :9-15
[6]   Biodiesel from microalgae [J].
Chisti, Yusuf .
BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2007, 25 (03) :294-306
[7]  
Farooq Ahmad Farooq Ahmad, 2012, Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, V11, P550
[8]   The effect of coagulation with MF/UF membrane filtration for the removal of virus in drinking water [J].
Fiksdal, Liv ;
Leiknes, TorOve .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 279 (1-2) :364-371
[9]   Fouling of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration membranes: A critical review [J].
Goosen, MFA ;
Sablani, SS ;
Ai-Hinai, H ;
Ai-Obeidani, S ;
Al-Belushi, R ;
Jackson, D .
SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 39 (10) :2261-2297
[10]   Oil extraction from microalgae for biodiesel production [J].
Halim, Ronald ;
Gladman, Brendan ;
Danquah, Michael K. ;
Webley, Paul A. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (01) :178-185