Improving importance-performance analysis: The role of the zone of tolerance and competitor performance. The case of Taiwan's hot spring hotels

被引:81
作者
Chen, Kuan-Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Pingtung Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Recreat Sport & Hlth Promot, Neipu 91201, Pingtung, Taiwan
关键词
Services quality; Zone of tolerance; Benchmarking; Hot spring hotels; SERVICE QUALITY; ATTRIBUTE-IMPORTANCE; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; MODEL; EXPECTATION; PERCEPTIONS; RELIABILITY; DYNAMICS; DEMATEL; RETURN;
D O I
10.1016/j.tourman.2013.06.009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Importance performance analysis (IPA) is a valuable and popular approach for prioritizing improvements to the quality of services. Despite its simplicity, shortcomings in the analytical framework remain: (a) its application is hindered by measurement bias; (b) it requires a crosshair placement mechanism to enhance the reliability of managerial interpretations; (c) it does not account for differences between the characteristics of quality attributes; (d) it ignores the relative performance of competitors in the competitive marketplace. Since all of these issues have important managerial implications, this work proposes a model for evaluating service quality based on the competitive zone of tolerance by bench-marking against competitors, and then constructs an analytical framework referred to as "CZIPA" (competitive ZOT service quality based IPA) for prioritizing quality improvements of quality attributes to resolve these above issues. The case of a Taiwanese hot springs hotel is presented to demonstrate the implementation of the proposed CZIPA. The results of this case study demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the determination of priorities of attributes for improvement using CZIPA, enabling hotel managers to achieve a competitive advantage. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 272
页数:13
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] Measuring service quality of a public university library in Bangladesh using SERVQUAL
    Ahmed, S. M. Zabed
    Shoeb, Md. Zahid Hossain
    [J]. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND METRICS, 2009, 10 (01) : 17 - 32
  • [2] Akbaba A., 2006, International Journal of Hospitality Management, V25, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2005.08.006
  • [3] Antony J., 2004, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, V16, P380, DOI 10.1108/09596110410550833
  • [4] A comparison of approaches to importance-performance analysis
    Bacon, DR
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2003, 45 (01) : 55 - 71
  • [5] Values, susceptibility to normative influence, and attribute importance weights: A nomological analysis
    Batra, R
    Homer, PM
    Kahle, LR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 11 (02) : 115 - 128
  • [6] Berry LL, 1997, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V38, P65
  • [7] Testing the reliability of weight elicitation methods: Direct rating versus point allocation
    Bottomley, PA
    Doyle, JR
    Green, RH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2000, 37 (04) : 508 - 513
  • [8] Burns A., 1986, J CONSUM MARK, V3, P49, DOI DOI 10.1108/EB008179
  • [9] Callan R. J., 2001, International Journal of Tourism Research, V3, P313, DOI 10.1002/jtr.333
  • [10] Campos D.F., 2009, Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management, V2, P56, DOI DOI 10.12660/joscmv2n2p56-71